Industry profile · NAICS 452990

Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order)

Workplace injury rates across 2,397 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

2,397
Employers
4.6
Avg TCR
3.4
BLS benchmark
26,789
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) average 4.6 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.4.

4.6
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.4
BLS national benchmark
2,397
employers reporting
26,789
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) Safety Data Reveals

The Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) sector (NAICS 452990) encompasses 2,397 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 26,789 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.6 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.4 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.6 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order) that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 36 of 48
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Mt Carmel Rural King Supply Mount Carmel, IL B 2.1
Big Lots Store #1184 NEW BERN, NC New Bern, NC B 2.1
Big Lots Store #1726 DUNN, NC Dunn, NC B 2.1
1795 Pisgah Forest, NC B 2.1
Roses 378 Zebulon, NC B 2.1
Big Lots Store #4598 Abilene, TX Abilene, TX B 2.1
Big Lots Store #535 OCALA, FL Ocala, FL B 2.1
Big Lots Store #4599 Salina, KS Salina, KS B 2.1
Big Lots Store #5347 Murfreesboro, TN Murfreesboro, TN B 2.1
Big Lots Store #5095 Livonia, MI Livonia, MI B 2.1
2954 Norwalk, CT B 2.1
Big Lots Stores #1366 Jacksonville, FL Jacksonville, FL B 2.1
Big Lots Store #1816 Warner Robbins, GA Warner Robins, GA B 2.1
Big Lots Store #1190 DALLAS, GA Dallas, GA B 2.1
Big Lots Store #62 FAIRMONT, WV Fairmont, WV B 2.1
Big Lots Store #1838 Troy, NY Troy, NY B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1994 KANSAS CITY, MO Kansas City, MO B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1411 RICHMOND, VA Richmond, VA B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1810 Calumet City, IL Calumet City, IL B 2.0
Big Lots Store #4715 Tucson, AZ Tucson, AZ B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1850 Huntsville, AL Huntsville, AL B 2.0
Big Lots Store #5154 Madison Heights, MI Madison Heights, MI B 2.0
Big Lots Store #372 AUSTELL, GA Austell, GA B 2.0
Big Lots Store #438 CHAMPAIGN, IL Champaign, IL B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1805 Asheboro, NC Asheboro, NC B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1200 SOUTH BEND, IN South Bend, IN B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1775 North Cape May, NJ North Cape May, NJ B 2.0
Runnings of Wabash Wabash, IN B 2.0
Big Lots Store #4610 Edinburg, TX Edinburg, TX B 2.0
Big Lots Store #497 PIQUA, OH Piqua, OH B 2.0
Big Lots Store #4660 Albany, OR Albany, OR B 2.0
Big Lots Store #157 NEW CASTLE, PA New Castle, PA B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1784 Peoria, IL Peoria, IL B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1888 Vicksburg, MS Vicksburg, MS B 2.0
Big Lots Store #578 LAKE WORTH, FL Lake Worth, FL B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1998 FORT WORTH, TX Forth Worth, TX B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1956 TREXLERTON, PA Trexlerton, PA B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1781 Conway, SC Conway, SC B 2.0
Big Lots Store #4305 FLAGSTAFF, AZ Flagstaff, AZ B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1829 Greensboro, NC Greensboro, NC B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1899 Aberdeen, NC Aberdeen, NC B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1915 LUBBOCK, TX Lubbock, TX B 2.0
Big Lots Store #5157 Sanford, NC Sanford, NC B 2.0
Big Lots Store #4696 Moline, IL Moline, IL B 2.0
Big Lots Store #513 PORT RICHEY, FL Port Richey, FL B 2.0
Big Lots Store #5123 Columbia, SC Columbia, SC B 2.0
Big Lots Store #5182 Simpsonville, SC Simpsonville, SC B 2.0
Big Lots Store #5139 N. Charleston, SC North Charleston, SC B 2.0
Big Lots Store #1180 MARRERO, LA Marrero, LA B 2.0
Big Lots Store #555 STUART, FL Stuart, FL B 2.0
← Prev Page 36 of 48 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Catalog showrooms, general merchandise (except catalog mail-order)?

This sector averages 4.6 against a BLS benchmark of 3.4 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.