Industry profile · NAICS 325120

Compressed and liquefied industrial gas manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 370 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

370
Employers
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
1,983
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Compressed and liquefied industrial gas manufacturing average 3.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.0 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
370
employers reporting
1,983
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Compressed and liquefied industrial gas manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Compressed and liquefied industrial gas manufacturing sector (NAICS 325120) encompasses 370 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 1,983 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.5 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Compressed and liquefied industrial gas manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 8
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Brookhaven Dry Ice Plant Brookhaven, MS C 3.5
Curtis Bay Curtis Bay, MD C 3.5
Palm Plant Palm, PA C 3.4
Hopkinsville Hopkinsville, KY C 3.3
Linde - Parkersburg Washington, WV C 3.3
Indiana Oxygen Company Indianapolis, IN C 3.2
Reclamation Technologies Inc DBA A-Gas Americas Bowling Green, OH C 3.2
Air Liquide Advanced Materials - High Springs High Springs, FL C 3.1
Linde - Hammond Hammond, IN C 3.1
Cherokee Cherokee, AL C 3.1
Richmond Richmond, IN C 3.0
Praxair Canton 989 Canton, OH C 2.9
Clearfield Dry Ice Plant Clearfield, PA C 2.9
Boise Fill Plant Boise, ID C 2.9
Tualatin Packaged Gas Plant Tualatin, OR C 2.9
Burlington ASU Burlington, WI C 2.9
Linde - Research Triangle Park (EPP) Research Triangle Park, NC C 2.9
Linde - Otis Otis, KS C 2.8
Champaign - Interstate Champaign, IL C 2.8
Delille Oxygen Company Columbus, OH C 2.8
Midwest-Waukesha Waukesha, WI C 2.8
Alam Umb1 Mount Bethel, PA C 2.7
Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Pryor Facility Pryor, OK C 2.7
Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Gray Terminal Gray, TN C 2.7
Pekin, IL Pekin, IL B 2.6
Beatrice Dry Ice Plant Beatrice, NE B 2.6
Air Liquide Advanced Materials - Mount Bethel Facility Mount Bethel, PA B 2.6
Dayton NJ Dayton, NJ B 2.5
TI Blvd Gas Plant Dallas, TX B 2.5
Airgas Dry Ice - Star Star, MS B 2.4
Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- New Orleans Terminal New Orleans, LA B 2.3
Albuquerque ASU and Packaged Gas Plant Albuquerque, NM B 2.3
Denison Dry Ice Plant Denison, IA B 2.2
Praxair Ashtabula 934 Ashtabula, OH B 2.2
Pekin Dry Ice Plant Pekin, IL B 2.2
Linde 765 Magna, UT B 2.2
Lawton Packaged Gas Lawton, OK B 2.2
Linde - Twinsburg Twinsburg, OH B 2.2
Air Products and Chemicals Puyallup Facility Puyallup, WA B 2.1
Praxair Inc. #934 Ashtabula, OH B 2.1
US Gas Alsip, IL B 2.0
DCG Partnership 1 Pearland, TX B 2.0
Gaithersburg Branch 01 Gaithersburg, MD B 2.0
Jupiter ASU and Packaged Gas Plant Jupiter, FL B 2.0
Geismar Distribution Geismar, LA B 1.9
Air Product and Chemicals Inc.- Creighton Facility Creighton, PA B 1.9
New Cumberland/Arroyo New Cumberland, WV B 1.9
Champaign - Mattis Champaign, IL B 1.9
Albion Dry Ice Plant Albion, MI B 1.9
Praxair Inc. Suffield, CT #873 Suffield, CT B 1.9
← Prev Page 3 of 8 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Compressed and liquefied industrial gas manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.5 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.