Industry profile · NAICS 811310

Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial

Workplace injury rates across 2,752 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

2,752
Employers
3.5
Avg TCR
2.1
BLS benchmark
20,500
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial average 3.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.7 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.1.

3.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.1
BLS national benchmark
2,752
employers reporting
20,500
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial Safety Data Reveals

The Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial sector (NAICS 811310) encompasses 2,752 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 20,500 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.1 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.5 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 56 of 61
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Creative Environment Corp Cranston, RI C 0.0
Greenway Equipment Marianna Marianna, AR C 0.0
Ryder Location 1137 Akron, Ohio, OH C 0.0
JMW Welding Canton, OH C 0.0
Reliable Turbine Services LLC Sullivan, MO C 0.0
FMS-0234 Houston, TX C 0.0
Ryder Phoenix West Phoenix, AZ C 0.0
Flowserve FCO Baton Rouge, LA C 0.0
Services : Rotterdam, NY, USA Schenectady, NY C 0.0
Services : PS FS North America Midlothian, VA C 0.0
Atlanta Yard Peachtree City, GA C 0.0
Custom Valve Repair New Castle, PA C 0.0
Crown Lift Trucks Newark Hebron, OH C 0.0
SPMOG - Buckhannon Buckhannon, WV C 0.0
SPMOG - FT Worth SVC Fort Worth, TX C 0.0
SPMOG - Sayre Sayre, PA C 0.0
Hays Enterprises, Inc Lordstown, OH C 0.0
Cofield Maintenance Cofield, NC C 0.0
Pengate Handling Systems Inc - Pittsburgh Cranberry, PA C 0.0
Ryder System, Inc. Rocky Mount, NC C 0.0
MacAllister Machinery Bloomington Bloomington, IN C 0.0
MacAllister Machinery Fishers Fishers, IN C 0.0
MacAllister Machinery Muncie York Town, IN C 0.0
MacAllister Machinery Vincennes Vincennes, IN C 0.0
Textron Specialized Vehicles - TUG BOS Boston, MA C 0.0
Covanta - Palm Beach Resources Recovery West Palm Beach, FL C 0.0
ITW/Hobart Service-Salt Lake City Branch Salt Lake City, UT C 0.0
ITW/Hobart Service-Phoenix Phoenix, AZ C 0.0
ITW/Hobart Service-Tampa Branch Tampa, FL C 0.0
Flowserve Corpus Christi Pump QRC Corpus Christi, TX C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southeast : SVC-Huntsville AL-USA Huntsville, AL C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southeast : SVC-Mobile-AL-USA Mobile, AL C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southeast : SVC-Montgomery AL-USA Montgomery, AL C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-California Southwest Hawaii : SVC-Tucson AZ-USA Tucson, AZ C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-California Southwest Hawaii : SVC-San Diego CA-USA San Diego, CA C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Florida : SVC - Ft Myers FL USA Fort Myers, FL C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Florida : SVC - Hudson FL USA Hudson, FL C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Florida : SVC - West Palm Beach FL USA West Palm Beach, FL C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Mid-America Heartland : SVC-Davenport IA-USA Davenport, IA C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southeast : SVC-New Orleans LA-USA Metairie, LA C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Greater Northeast : SVC-Portland ME-USA Westbrook, ME C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Southeast : SVC-Jackson MS-USA Ridgeland, MS C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-California Southwest Hawaii : SVC-Las Vegas NV-USA Las Vegas, NV C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Greater Northeast : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA Williamsville, NY C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Upper Midwest : SVC-Fargo ND-USA Fargo, ND C 0.0
Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Upper Midwest : SVC-Sioux Falls SD-USA Sioux Falls, SD C 0.0
New York Boiler, Inc. Brooklyn, NY C 0.0
The Petada Co., LLC Depew, NY C 0.0
Corporate/DPS Phoenix, AZ C 0.0
NEAC Compressor Service USA Katy Katy, TX C 0.0
← Prev Page 56 of 61 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial?

This sector averages 3.5 against a BLS benchmark of 2.1 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.