Industry profile · NAICS 325199

Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 647 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

647
Employers
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
4,030
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing average 2.2 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.2
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
647
employers reporting
4,030
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing sector (NAICS 325199) encompasses 647 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,030 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.2 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 13 of 14
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Novozymes North America Durham, NC C 0.0
ChemGenes, Billerica Billerica, MA C 0.0
SI Group, Inc. Newport, TN C 0.0
Methanex USA, LLC Geismar, LA C 0.0
Evonik Deer Park Deer Park, TX C 0.0
SI Group Morgantown Morgantown, WV C 0.0
Monroe Alfrebro LLC Monroe, OH C 0.0
The Hallstar Company Chicago, IL C 0.0
Sepax Technologies Inc Newark, DE C 0.0
Hero BX - Clinton, IA Clinton, IA C 0.0
Aculon, Inc San Diego, CA C 0.0
SI Group - Newport Newport, TN C 0.0
BASF North Geismar Site Geismar, LA C 0.0
Veltek Associates, Inc. - CW Exton, PA C 0.0
Oligomers MVW Office League City, TX C 0.0
INEOS Oligomers La Porte La Porte, TX C 0.0
Wiley Companies Granville Granville, OH C 0.0
Chem Service, Inc. West Chester, PA C 0.0
MI045 Beaver Creek - Grayling Chemical Grayling, MI C 0.0
OR100 Eugene Chemical Eugene, OR C 0.0
Specialty Products US, LLC Institute, WV C 0.0
Kaderly Columbus, OH C 0.0
Nouryon Expancel Green Bay, WI C 0.0
Red Rock Biofuels Lakeview, OR C 0.0
Hero BX - Clinton Clinton, IA C 0.0
Renmatix - Integrated Plantrose Complex Kennesaw, GA C 0.0
Life Sciences : IDT - Redwood City Redwood City, CA C 0.0
Life Sciences : IDT - Coralville 2500 Coralville, IA C 0.0
Life Sciences : IDT - Coralville 2660 Coralville, IA C 0.0
Life Sciences : IDT - Coralville 2812 Coralville, IA C 0.0
Road Science Tulsa, OK C 0.0
Americas Resins and Global FM : Geismar Gesimar, LA C 0.0
Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. Mapleton Site Mapleton, IL C 0.0
US Amines Portsmouth Portsmouth, VA C 0.0
LANXESS Naugatuck Research & Development Laboratories Naugatuck, CT C 0.0
MEGlobal Oyster Creek Site Sugarland, TX C 0.0
Sugarland Office Sugarland, TX C 0.0
Americas Resins and Global FM : Acme Riegelwood, NC C 0.0
Clariant Corporation Monroe Road Regional Headquarters Charlotte, NC C 0.0
Danisco US, Inc. - Winton Place Rochester, NY C 0.0
Innova Flavors - Lombard Lombard, IL C 0.0
Honeywell Burdick & Jackson Muskegon, MI C 0.0
Ashland Specialty Ingredients Chatham, NJ C 0.0
BP Cooper River Plant Wando, SC C 0.0
Albemarle Corporation Baton Rouge, LA C 0.0
Community Fuels Stockton, CA C 0.0
Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - ASC Coralville, IA C 0.0
Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - BVC Coralville, IA C 0.0
Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - ITC Coralville, IA C 0.0
Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. - Research Coralville, IA C 0.0
← Prev Page 13 of 14 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Esters, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.2 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.