Industry profile · NAICS 326199

Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 2,942 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

2,942
Employers
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
57,976
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing average 4.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.4
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
2,942
employers reporting
57,976
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing sector (NAICS 326199) encompasses 2,942 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 57,976 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.4 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 45 of 60
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Merrill Sterling Heights, MI B 1.9
Maysville Plant Maysville, KY B 1.9
2489 Caldwell Court Auburn, AL B 1.9
Simonton Windows Paris, IL B 1.9
Fabri-Kal Mountain Top a part of Pactiv Evergreen Mountain Top, PA B 1.9
Fabri-Kal Corporation-Hazleton, PA Hazleton, PA B 1.9
Latham Packaged Pools - Latham, NY Latham, NY B 1.9
Buena Buena, NJ B 1.9
CertainTeed Corporation Williamsport Maryland Williamsport, MD B 1.9
Weathergard Window Company Inc Farmington, MI B 1.9
L. F. Manufacturing, Inc. Main Plant Giddings, TX B 1.9
Letica-Kentucky Fulton, KY B 1.9
Palram Americas Kutztown, PA B 1.8
4078_7790 South Haven, MI B 1.8
Systex Products Corporation 300 Battle Creek, MI B 1.8
Visual Options Tacoma, WA B 1.8
HunterDouglas Plastics & Die Casting Center Owensboro, KY B 1.8
Mine Safety Appliances, LLC Jacksonville, NC B 1.8
Lancaster Mold Lancaster, PA B 1.8
Bway Valparaiso Valparaiso, IN B 1.8
Dakkota Molding Technologies Rochester Hills, MI B 1.8
Crane Composites Inc. - Channahon Facility Channahon, IL B 1.8
Fairport Site Fairport, NY B 1.8
Foodservice : BEDFORD PARK THERMO Bedford Park, IL B 1.8
ADAC Automotive, Inc. - Olthoff Plant Muskegon, MI B 1.8
Variform Inc. dba Ply Gem Siding Group Martinsburg, WV B 1.8
Location 1 / UC Union City, CA B 1.8
Akron Polymer Products Akron, OH B 1.8
Electrical Components International Atlanta, TX B 1.8
ITW Automotive- Westminster, MA Westminster, MA B 1.8
Decatur Plastic Products Inc - Indiana Molding Division North Vernon, IN B 1.8
WNA-Chelmsford Chelmsford, MA B 1.8
Fabri Kal LLC Burley, ID B 1.8
Natech Plastics Ronkonkoma, NY B 1.8
Armstrong Flooring Inc. South Gate, CA B 1.8
ORBIS Urbana Urbana, OH B 1.8
Berry Global - Streetsboro, OH Streetsboro, OH B 1.8
Polymer Corporation Rockland, MA B 1.8
Indiana Plastics, Inc Elkhart, IN B 1.8
Nova Optical Laboratory Orangeburg, NY B 1.8
Boral Building Products TruExterior Salisbury, NC B 1.8
Creative Liquid Coatings, Inc. Brownsville Brownsville, TX B 1.8
Oakland Oakland, NJ B 1.8
SimEx, Incorporated St. Marys, WV B 1.8
Bway Newnan, GA B 1.8
Chesterfield (Mt Clemens) MFG (EF, AUTO) Chesterfield, MI B 1.8
AP Carolina Simpsonville, SC B 1.8
West Contract Manufcaturing LLC Cayey, PR B 1.8
Decatur Plastic Products Inc - Alabama Molding Division Gadsden, AL B 1.8
Allegheny Performance Plastics, LLC Leetsdale, PA B 1.8
← Prev Page 45 of 60 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.4 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.