Industry profile · NAICS 326199

Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 2,942 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

2,942
Employers
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
57,976
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing average 4.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.4
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
2,942
employers reporting
57,976
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing sector (NAICS 326199) encompasses 2,942 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 57,976 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.4 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 52 of 60
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Container Components Jonesboro, AR A 1.1
Pilot Plastics Peninsula, OH A 1.1
RCTenn Gallatin, TN A 1.1
Newberry SC Newberry, SC A 1.1
Cooper Standard Leonard Leonard, MI A 1.1
Westlake Royal Building Products - Franklin Franklin, OH A 1.1
421 Rem Bolingbrook, IL A 1.1
Signature Systems Group, LLC. Flower Mound, TX A 1.1
Berry Global, Inc. Tolleson, AZ A 1.1
Riverside Plastics, Inc. Bonaparte, IA A 1.1
Churchill Container Shawnee, KS A 1.1
Advantech Plastics Woodstock, IL A 1.1
Chillicothe-Global Plastics- Injection M - F051 Chillicothe, MO A 1.1
Jabil Healthcare Asheville Arden, NC A 1.1
Vpet USA LLC - Texas Garland, TX A 1.1
Pinckney/Paragon-Global Plastics- Inject - F016 Union, SC A 1.1
Schoeneck Containers Inc. Delavan Delavan, WI A 1.1
AN Richmond Richmond, IN A 1.1
KLEERTECH Fenton, MO A 1.1
Bemis Healthcare Packaging Mankato, MN A 1.1
Smith & Wesson Precision Components Plastics, Deep River, CT A 1.1
Foodservice : MASSASOIT Bedford Park, IL A 1.1
DAK Americas LLC (An Alpek Polyester Company) Moncks Corner, SC A 1.1
Johnson Controls PS - Oconee Facility West Union SC- 00023 West Union, SC A 1.1
Beecher, IL - 37 Beecher, IL A 1.1
Schaefer Plastics North America Charlotte, NC A 1.1
Greenfield Precision Plastics Greenfield, OH A 1.1
IMS Gear Holding, Inc Gainesville, GA A 1.1
Rubbermaid Consumer Products Winfield, KS A 1.1
Bericap LLC Ontario, CA A 1.1
Boardman Molded Products, Inc. Youngstown, OH A 1.1
Carrollton Carrollton, OH A 1.1
Essentra Pipe Protection Technologies Houston, TX A 1.1
Octex Holdings LLC Sarasota, FL A 1.1
Deflecto Indianapolis, IN A 1.1
Atalys Asheboro LLC Asheboro, NC A 1.1
Precision Concepts - Mebane Mebane, NC A 1.1
Maple Valley Plastics, LLC Brown City, MI A 1.1
Sacramento IDEMIA Mcclellan Park, CA A 1.1
Mauser Packaging Cedar City Cedar City, UT A 1.1
Milgard Windows & Doors -- Corporate Office / Vinyl Window & Door Manufacturing Fife, WA A 1.1
Westland Westland, MI A 1.0
Westlake Royal Building Products- Latta Latta, SC A 1.0
Hanover Berry Global Hanover, MD A 1.0
Amcor Healthcare Packaging Mankato, MN A 1.0
Rohrer Corporation - Bensenville Facility Bensenville, IL A 1.0
D&W Fine Pack Lake Zurich, IL A 1.0
Gaffney Plant Gaffney, SC A 1.0
Valparaiso Plant Valparaiso, IN A 1.0
Berry Global Lawrence, KS A 1.0
← Prev Page 52 of 60 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Fiberglass Pool Manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.4 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.