Industry profile · NAICS 238110

Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors

Workplace injury rates across 1,453 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

1,453
Employers
5.0
Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
23,847
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors average 5.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.8 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.8.

5.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.8
BLS national benchmark
1,453
employers reporting
23,847
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors Safety Data Reveals

The Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors sector (NAICS 238110) encompasses 1,453 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 23,847 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.0 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 19 of 30
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Waggoner Construction Inc. East Berlin, PA C 2.3
Bazella Group Whitehall, PA C 2.3
Brundage-Bone Concrete Pumping Thornton, CO C 2.3
Suntec Concrete - CO Operations Commerce City, CO C 2.3
Miller and Long Co. Inc. Bethesda, MD C 2.3
Narum Concrete Construction, Inc Walla Walla, WA C 2.3
R&S Construction Management Inc. San Francisco, CA C 2.3
FX Construction Highland, UT C 2.3
Olshan Foundation Repair Co. of Jackson LLC Jackson, MS C 2.3
Malcolm Drilling Southern CA Irwindale, CA C 2.3
Blanco Concrete, LLC Tucson, AZ C 2.3
Briegan Concrete LLC Clayton, NC C 2.3
Baker DC, LLC Washington, DC C 2.3
Menke Bros. Delphos, OH C 2.3
KD Construction of Florida, LLC Pompano Beach, FL C 2.3
Noel Main Office Albuquerque, NM C 2.3
Burke Concrete Construction LLC Purcellville, VA C 2.3
Musselman and Hall Contractors, LLC Kansas City, MO C 2.3
Grand River Construction Hudsonville, MI C 2.3
John Strafach & Sons, Inc Westerly, RI C 2.3
Action Cement Inc. Lodi, CA C 2.3
T&D Moravits & Company San Antonio, TX C 2.3
Linhart Construction, Inc. Omaha, NE C 2.3
MG Constructors & Engineers INC Morgan Hill, CA C 2.2
Suntec Concrete - Utah Salt Lake City, UT C 2.2
Kalman Floor Company Golden, CO C 2.2
Casey-Fogli Concrete Contractors, Inc. Hayward, CA B 2.2
Baker DC, LLC Monroe, OH B 2.2
Central Broward Construction Ft. Lauderdale, FL B 2.2
Miller & Long Co Inc Bethesda, MD B 2.2
Alpha Orlando Apopka, FL B 2.2
Hamilton-Elles, Inc Memphis, TN B 2.2
Kent Companies Texas Office Lewisville, TX B 2.2
H & M Precision Concrete Greenville, OH B 2.2
Hemma Concrete Inc. Marietta, GA B 2.2
Keystone Concrete Placement Georgetown Georgetown, TX B 2.2
Murray-Ward Contracting Inc. Lewisville, TX B 2.2
Advance Concrete Garner, NC B 2.2
Molly Construction Warrington, PA B 2.2
Cavan Constrcution Co., Inc. Aston, PA B 2.2
Cardinal Concrete Corporation Midland, NC B 2.2
Capform TX Carrollton, TX B 2.2
Cleveland Cement Contractors, Inc Colonial Heights, VA B 2.2
Larson-Danielson Construction La Porte, IN B 2.1
Shaw & Sons, Inc. Costa Mesa, CA B 2.1
Desert Vista Concrete, LLC Phoenix, AZ B 2.1
Palatial Concrete Ltd. Calverton, NY B 2.1
Zapalac/Reed Construction Company, LP Bee Cave, TX B 2.1
Syblon Reid General Engineering Contractors Folsom, CA B 2.1
06-345494731-4 Berkeley, CA B 2.1
← Prev Page 19 of 30 Next →

Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All industries → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors?

This sector averages 5.0 against a BLS benchmark of 2.8 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.