Industry profile · NAICS 484110

General freight trucking, local

Workplace injury rates across 2,971 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

2,971
Employers
5.7
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
39,025
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in General freight trucking, local average 5.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

5.7
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
2,971
employers reporting
39,025
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What General freight trucking, local Safety Data Reveals

The General freight trucking, local sector (NAICS 484110) encompasses 2,971 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 39,025 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 5.7 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within General freight trucking, local that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 32 of 62
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Las Vista Las Vista, NE C 4.2
Penske : 4884-00 Starbucks-DCC/Phoenix, AZ Phoenix, AZ C 4.2
GRS Transportation, LLC Chippewa Falls, WI C 4.2
E.C.T.I. San Bernardino, CA C 4.2
Pride Intermodal INC Commerce, CA C 4.2
Fidelitone - Charlotte, NC Charlotte, NC C 4.2
Hanover Depot Hanover, MD C 4.2
Columbus Oh - Eww (Ohcbs) Columbus, OH C 4.2
Complete Logistics Solutions LLC Phoenix, AZ C 4.2
Freight, Lime and Sand Hauling, Inc Green Lake, WI C 4.2
Pflugerville Pflugerville, TX C 4.2
NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-200 US HWY RTE 1 9 South Newark, NJ C 4.2
Corporate Office Chester Springs, PA C 4.2
New York (Nysga) Springfield Gardens, NY C 4.1
TDP Transport Houston Houston, TX C 4.1
DCC : 5546-00 Buffalo-DCC/Birmingham, AL Birmingham, AL C 4.1
Capri - Los Angeles Pico Rivera, CA C 4.1
A&A Trucking Clinton, ME C 4.1
Custom Ecology, Inc-Roseboro Roseboro, NC C 4.1
Tom Calabrese Trucking, Inc. Arvada, CO C 4.1
Batavia - Aldi Batavia, IL C 4.1
Ryder - 4209 - Owensboro Owensboro, KY C 4.1
Duggans Trucking Inc Linden, NJ C 4.1
Sutton Trucking Inc Lees Summit, MO C 4.1
STD Inc Joplin, MO C 4.1
Mongoose Trucking And Hotshot LLC Parshall, ND C 4.1
HTI-California California, MO C 4.1
JIT Transportation Milpitas, CA C 4.1
R & J Boardman Youngstown, OH C 4.1
SNL Distribution Services Corp-San Antonio San Antonio, TX C 4.1
Gilbert co. Pomona Pomona, CA C 4.1
Dwynne R. Sutheimer, Inc. Stevens Point, WI C 4.1
Ohemn - Norfolk Southern Dayton, OH C 4.1
Pitt Ohio - Indianapolis Indianapolis, IN C 4.1
Kallmeyer Bros. Enterprises, Inc. Hermann, MO C 4.1
Aim Integrated Logistics Inc. Michael Lewis Mccook, IL C 4.1
LTG Memphis, TN C 4.0
Lexington (Kylxo) Lexington, KY C 4.0
Toledo (Ohtlo) Toledo, OH C 4.0
Gainesville (Gajef) Jefferson, GA C 4.0
NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-1 SEA BOX DRIVE Cinnaminson, NJ C 4.0
M&M Transport - Chambersburg Operations Chambersburg, PA C 4.0
Tnebr - Memphis Memphis, TN C 4.0
07784 TMMK Dock Georgetown, KY C 4.0
Sharp Transit of Salisbury Salisbury, NC C 4.0
NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-1315 TOLLAND TURNPIKE Manchester, CT C 4.0
BIS Bismarck, ND C 4.0
885_15713 Coon Rapids, MN C 4.0
HDS-W Jefferson West Jefferson, OH C 4.0
NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-1574 Penniman Road Williamsburg, VA C 4.0
← Prev Page 32 of 62 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in General freight trucking, local?

This sector averages 5.7 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.