Industry profile · NAICS 561612

Guard services

Workplace injury rates across 173 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

173
Employers
3.5
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
2,804
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Guard services average 3.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

3.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
173
employers reporting
2,804
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Guard services Safety Data Reveals

The Guard services sector (NAICS 561612) encompasses 173 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,804 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.5 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Guard services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 5
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
First Coast Security Solutions Jacksonville, FL B 1.6
Synergy Security Services Lagrange, GA B 1.6
Global Security Concepts Las Vegas, NV B 1.6
Pierce County Security, Inc Tacoma, WA B 1.6
Security Resources Inc. Cherry Hill, NJ B 1.6
Corporate Dumfries, VA B 1.5
Titan Global, LLC Islandia, NY B 1.5
Lyons Security Service, Inc. NOCAL Anaheim Hills, CA B 1.5
USGS Reston, VA B 1.5
All N 1 Security Atlanta, GA B 1.5
Security Resources (PA) Philadelphia, PA B 1.4
American Security - Nebraska Omaha, NE B 1.4
New Age Protection, Inc. Springfield, VA B 1.4
Triangle Services - Minnesota Area Security Route Svcs Woodbury, MN B 1.4
UNIT520 Lansing, MI B 1.4
Corporate Northridge, CA B 1.4
Premier Security Solutions Flint, MI B 1.3
Metropolitan Security Group New York, NY B 1.3
New Jersey Union, NJ A 1.3
Gavin de Becker & Associates Glendale, CA A 1.3
Corporate Uniondale, NY A 1.3
PalAmerican Security Bay Area, Inc San Francisco, CA A 1.3
SSC, Inc. Shelton, CT A 1.3
Classic Security, LLC New York, NY A 1.2
American Security - Wisconsin Wauwatosa, WI A 1.2
JFK-NY Jamaica, NY A 1.2
Golden Services, LLC Oak Ridge, TN A 1.2
Parkchester DPS LLC. Bronx, NY A 1.2
GSI-1 Monterey Park Monterey Park, CA A 1.2
McAlester OK Mcalester, OK A 1.1
Custom Protection Security Inc. Doral, FL A 1.1
Guilford County - Security Greensboro, NC A 1.0
Security America, Inc. Charleston, WV A 1.0
Fort Bragg NC Fort Bragg, NC A 1.0
ISSAction - New York City Housing Authority New York, NY A 0.9
American Security, LLC St Paul, MN A 0.9
S1 Security Group Inc Doral, FL A 0.9
CBP Yuma, AZ A 0.8
The Diamond Group Fort Worth, TX A 0.8
Harvard Protection Services LLC of New York New York, NY A 0.8
Dunbar Security Solutions Hunt Valley, MD A 0.8
GSI-6 Ontario Ontario, CA A 0.8
Heightened Security Inc New York, NY A 0.7
9007-2002 St. Paul, MN A 0.6
Northeast Security Westwood, MA A 0.6
Spartan Security Services, Inc. Jersey City, NJ A 0.6
Platinum Event Services Inc Dallas, TX A 0.6
DOL Washington, DC A 0.6
Augusta US VA Augusta VA069 Falls Church, VA A 0.6
SFM Security Services, Inc Hialeah Gardens, FL A 0.5
← Prev Page 3 of 5 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Guard services?

This sector averages 3.5 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.