Industry profile · NAICS 623312

Homes for the elderly without nursing care

Workplace injury rates across 6,639 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

6,639
Employers
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
BLS benchmark
77,071
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Homes for the elderly without nursing care average 8.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.8.

8.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.8
BLS national benchmark
6,639
employers reporting
77,071
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Homes for the elderly without nursing care Safety Data Reveals

The Homes for the elderly without nursing care sector (NAICS 623312) encompasses 6,639 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 77,071 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 8.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.8 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 8.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark — a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers — not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Homes for the elderly without nursing care that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 139 of 139
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Balanced Home Care PEARL RIVER, NY C 0.0
Legacy at Village Wood PENFIELD, NY C 0.0
Augustana EC Shakopee SHAKOPEE, MN C 0.0
Manor House of Opelika OPELIKA, AL C 0.0
Brookdale Orchard Glen ORCHARD PARK, NY C 0.0
Brookdale Hanceville # 17960 HANCEVILLE, AL C 0.0
Brookdale Country Day Rd. GOLDSBORO, NC C 0.0
BrenwoodPark Senior Living DBA BrenwoodPark Assisted Living FRANKLIN, WI C 0.0
STRATFORD COMMONS MEMORY CARE OVERLAND PARK, KS C 0.0
Brookdale Grants Pass Springs GRANTS PASS, OR C 0.0
Hampden Operations, LLC ROANOKE, VA C 0.0
Brookdale Brentmoor Minot MINOT, ND C 0.0
IP Avanti Towne Lake OPCO LLC CYPRESS, TX C 0.0
Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 238 S 2nd Street MONTROSE, CO C 0.0
Cambridge Square Assisted living ROSENBERG, TX C 0.0
The Trace COVINGTON, LA C 0.0
Cedarhurst Living Corporate Office CLAYTON, MO C 0.0
5612_12437 BEDFORD, NH
Edgewood Alexandria Senior Living LLC ALEXANDRIA, MN
The Chelsea at Greenburgh GREENBURGH, NY
Oakmont Gardens SANTA ROSA, CA
CSH Plainview LLC PLAINVIEW, NY
← Prev Page 139 of 139
Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Homes for the elderly without nursing care?

This sector averages 8.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.8 — but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.