Industry profile · NAICS 925110
Housing programs, planning and development, government
Workplace injury rates across 62 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 54 establishments with a credible rate.
- 62
- Employers
- 4.7
- Avg TCR (rated)
- 3.2
- BLS benchmark
- 637
- Injuries (all)
The industry picture
The 54 rated employers in Housing programs, planning and development, government average 4.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.5 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.
- 4.7
- avg TCR · rated subset
- 3.2
- BLS national benchmark
- 54
- rated employers
- 637
- recordable injuries (all)
ITA inventory (62) and injury totals cover every reporting establishment; the average TCR is the rated subset only. Corpus rank matches /rankings/most-dangerous-industries (≥100 rated employers). BLS IIF is a separate survey population, see Methodology → Three Populations.
What Housing programs, planning and development, government Safety Data Reveals
The Housing programs, planning and development, government sector (NAICS 925110) encompasses 62 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 637 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window. The industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year is computed on the 54 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology). Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.7 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.
The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Housing programs, planning and development, government that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.
Employers in this industry, by injury rate
Page 2 of 2| Employer | Location | Grade | Avg TCR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut Housing Finance Authority | Rocky Hill, CT | A | 0.6 |
| City of Minneapolis CPED | Minneapolis, MN | A | 0.3 |
| Building & Planning | Kelso, WA | A | 0.1 |
| Tennessee Housing Development Agency | Nashville, TN | A | 0.1 |
| DOH001 Department of Housing | Hartford, CT | C | 0.0 |
| Community and Economic Development | Merced, CA | C | 0.0 |
| Planning Office | Prince William, VA | C | 0.0 |
| City of South San Francisco - City Hall Annex | South San Francisco, CA | C | 0.0 |
| Orange County - Housing and Community -Community Development - Hillsborough | Hillsborough, NC | C | 0.0 |
| Tennessee Housing Development Agency - VMLS | Nashville, TN | C | 0.0 |
| New Neighborhoods | Stamford, CT | C | 0.0 |
| PHA - Dunedin Hi-Rise/Terrace/Community Center | St. Paul, MN | C | 0.0 |
Safety grades are a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA and BLS data, not an official OSHA rating. Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Working in Housing programs, planning and development, government?
This sector averages 4.7 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.
- Look up a specific employer in this industry, not just the sector average. Look up an employer
- See how this industry ranks against every other sector. Industry rankings
- Learn what an A-to-F grade requires within an industry benchmark. How grades work
Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.