Industry profile · NAICS 561720

Janitorial services

Workplace injury rates across 4,031 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

4,031
Employers
4.3
Avg TCR
4.5
BLS benchmark
56,930
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Janitorial services average 4.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 4.5.

4.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
4.5
BLS national benchmark
4,031
employers reporting
56,930
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Janitorial services Safety Data Reveals

The Janitorial services sector (NAICS 561720) encompasses 4,031 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 56,930 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 4.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.3 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Janitorial services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 8 of 104
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Molly Maid of Albuquerque Albuquerque, NM F 9.7
Sodexo at Sharp Chula Vista Med Hskp Chula Vista, CA F 9.7
HES H Ed at Oklahoma City Community College Oklahoma City, OK F 9.7
Towneast Mall Plano, TX F 9.7
Tinker Work Projects Custodial Tinker Afb, OK F 9.7
Hyatt Crystal City Arlington, VA F 9.6
212735 Duluth, GA F 9.6
Main Office Clearwater, FL F 9.6
Blackmon Mooring of Tulsa LLC Tulsa, OK F 9.6
National Management Resources (Alma College) Alma, MI F 9.6
Des Moines Des Moines, IA F 9.6
Bbb 16070 San Francisco, CA F 9.5
District 5 -Central Oahu Regional Park Waipahu, HI F 9.5
Donna Office Pharr, TX F 9.5
Orange Park Medical Center Orange Park, FL F 9.5
Goodwill Services Janitorial Contract Staff Ft Myers, FL F 9.5
HES H Ed at Albion College Albion, MI F 9.5
258597 Kenosha, WI F 9.5
National Management Resources Midland University Fremont, NE F 9.5
Performance Restoration, Inc. Spokane, WA F 9.5
HES H Ed at Orland Park D230 Schools Orland Park, IL F 9.4
EMS Florida - Tampa (Central) Tampa, FL F 9.4
Maid Brigade of Phoenix Phoenix, AZ F 9.4
279866 Phoenix, AZ F 9.4
Xanitos EVS at St. Mary's Medical Center West Palm Beach, FL F 9.3
212782 Coppell, TX F 9.3
Bms Cat of North Carolina, LLC- Clt Concord, NC F 9.3
JESCO Del Rio, TX F 9.3
Universidad Politecnica San Juan, PR F 9.3
Hyatt Cambridge Cambridge, MA F 9.3
Good Samaritan Hospital (CA) Los Angeles, CA F 9.3
International Aero Services LLC Bellflower, CA F 9.3
The DM Burr Group - City of Troy Troy, MI F 9.3
Sodexo at Quest Diagnostics Evs Tucker, GA F 9.3
Smc7102 - Servicemaster of Arlington Manassas, VA F 9.3
HES K12 at Wilson College Chambersburg, PA F 9.3
California - Hallcon Ops Lenexa, KS F 9.3
PSSI - 0311 Crider Foods Stillmore, GA F 9.3
Wurm's Janitorial Services, Inc Corona, CA F 9.3
Chimes District of Columbia, Ft. Meade Ft. Meade, MD F 9.3
Miami Dade Police Department HQ Miami, FL F 9.2
IFBF Property Management, Inc/Attn: HR Employee Health Services West Des Moines, IA F 9.2
Brevard Achievement Center - Port Canaveral Cape Canaveral, FL F 9.2
Chicago Public Schools Chicago, IL F 9.2
Sodexo at Sharp Grossmont Hospital Hskp La Mesa, CA F 9.2
Ameri-Kleen - Hollister Branch Hollister, CA F 9.2
Pssi / Tyson Foods Inc. - Center Center, TX F 9.2
Peerless Cleaners Inc.-1295 Decatur, IL F 9.2
Everclear Cleaning Solutions, LLC- ALDIOKS_ECS, Olathe, KS Melbourne, FL F 9.2
413842 Stockton, CA F 9.1
← Prev Page 8 of 104 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Janitorial services?

This sector averages 4.3 against a BLS benchmark of 4.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.