Industry profile · NAICS 325194

Maleic anhydride manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 61 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 58 establishments with a credible rate.

61
Employers
2.4
Avg TCR (rated)
3.3
BLS benchmark
424
Injuries (all)

The industry picture

The 58 rated employers in Maleic anhydride manufacturing average 2.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

2.4
avg TCR · rated subset
3.3
BLS national benchmark
58
rated employers
424
recordable injuries (all)

ITA inventory (61) and injury totals cover every reporting establishment; the average TCR is the rated subset only. BLS IIF is a separate survey population, see Methodology → Three Populations.

What Maleic anhydride manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Maleic anhydride manufacturing sector (NAICS 325194) encompasses 61 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 424 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window. The industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year is computed on the 58 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology). Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.4 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Maleic anhydride manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 2 of 2
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Kraton Chemical LLC, Dover Site Dover, OH A 0.5
The Chemours Company FC, LLC - Pascagoula Pascagoula, MS A 0.5
SI Group - Freeport PFPT Freeport, TX A 0.4
Belle Belle, MO A 0.4
ALTIVIA Petrochemicals, LLC - Haverhill Complex Haverhill, OH A 0.3
INEOS Styrolution Pasadena, TX A 0.2
Sasol Chemicals (USA) LLC. Greens Bayou Plant Houston, TX A 0.1
INEOS Phenol Mobile Theodore, AL A 0.1
Lanxess Corporation Baytown, TX C 0.0
The Dow Chemical Company - Beaumont, Texas Nederland, TX C 0.0
TIC Gums (BMOC) Belcamp, MD C 0.0
TIC Gums (White Marsh) White Marsh, MD C 0.0
DRT America, LLC Rincon, GA C 0.0
Bastech, LLC Jacksonville, FL C 0.0
The Dow Chemical Company - Beaumont Operations Nederland, TX C 0.0
← Prev Page 2 of 2
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Maleic anhydride manufacturing?

This sector averages 2.4 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.