Industry profile · NAICS 326122

Pipe fittings, rigid plastics, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 361 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

361
Employers
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
5,342
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Pipe fittings, rigid plastics, manufacturing average 4.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.4 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

4.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
361
employers reporting
5,342
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Pipe fittings, rigid plastics, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Pipe fittings, rigid plastics, manufacturing sector (NAICS 326122) encompasses 361 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 5,342 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.5 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Pipe fittings, rigid plastics, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 4 of 8
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
IPG - Endicott Mills Ave Endicott, NY D 4.0
Atkore Plastic Pipe Milford, UT D 4.0
Spears Santa Paula Santa Paula, CA D 4.0
Prinsco, Inc. - Bethany Bethany, MO C 3.9
LASCO - Brownsville Brownsville, TN C 3.8
JM Manufacturing Cochranton, PA C 3.8
Heritage Plastics Tampa Tampa, FL C 3.8
Madera Madera, CA C 3.8
Diamond Plastics Corporation Grand Island Grand Island, NE C 3.8
Centennial Plastics, Inc. Nampa, ID C 3.8
Mendota Mendota, IL C 3.7
Cresline Plastic Pipe Company, Inc. Council Bluffs, IA C 3.7
REHAU Construction Cullman, AL C 3.7
Dura Corportate Office Beaumont, CA C 3.7
US7141 Binghamton Kirkwood, NY C 3.7
Future Pipe Industries, Inc. a Texas Corporation Houston, TX C 3.7
Clifford Clifford, MI C 3.6
Sand Springs Fiber Glass Systems, L.P. Sand Springs, OK C 3.6
Endurance Poly Producers Tennille, GA C 3.6
Uponor - Lakeville Lakeville, MN C 3.5
Waverly Waverly, NY C 3.5
CANTEX INC.-Injection Molding Mineral Wells, TX C 3.5
Performance Pipe - Reno Plant Reno, NV C 3.5
SANFORD Sanford, FL C 3.5
Dura-Line Elyria, OH C 3.5
Advanced Drainage Systems Inc.--Oelwein Oelwein, IA C 3.4
US7131: Eugene Eugene, OR C 3.4
Georg Fischer Central Plastics Shawnee, OK C 3.3
Green Leaf, Inc. Fontanet, IN C 3.3
Diamond Plastics Corporation Macon Macon, GA C 3.3
Advance Drainage Systems- SLC North Salt Lake, UT C 3.3
Advanced Drainage Systems Inc.-Eagle Grove Eagle Grove, IA C 3.2
Advanced Drainage Systems Inc. --Fairmont Fairmont, MN C 3.2
NIBCO Charlestown Charlestown, IN C 3.2
NIBCO Lebanon Lebanon, OH C 3.2
Portage Portage, MI C 3.2
NOV FiberGlass Systems - Fiberspar Products - Mfg Houstln, TX C 3.2
North American Pipe Wichita Falls, TX C 3.2
Future Pipe Industries, Inc. a Louisiana Corporation Baton Rouge, LA C 3.2
US7122: Tampa Tampa, FL C 3.2
Diamond Plastics Corporation Golconda Golconda, NV C 3.1
Diamond Plastics Corp - GI Grand Island, NE C 3.1
Ipex USA LLC Pineville, NC C 3.1
Diamond Plastics Corporation Lubbock Lubbock, TX C 3.1
New Miami Hamilton, OH C 3.1
IPG - Colfax Colfax, NC C 3.0
Teel Plastics-Teel Court Baraboo, WI C 3.0
Georg Fischer LLC - Little Rock, AR Little Rock, AR C 3.0
Ohio Steel Industries, Plastics Div. Columbus, OH C 3.0
Owosso Owosso, MI C 3.0
← Prev Page 4 of 8 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Pipe fittings, rigid plastics, manufacturing?

This sector averages 4.5 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.