Industry profile · NAICS 541720

Social science research and development services

Workplace injury rates across 24 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

24
Employers
2.3
Avg TCR
0.5
BLS benchmark
199
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Social science research and development services average 2.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 4.6 times the BLS national benchmark of 0.5.

2.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
0.5
BLS national benchmark
24
employers reporting
199
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Social science research and development services Safety Data Reveals

The Social science research and development services sector (NAICS 541720) encompasses 24 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 199 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 0.5 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Social science research and development services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 1
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Highland Springs Highland Hills, OH F 11.1
Hi'ipaka LLC, Waimea Valley Haleiwa, HI F 5.4
Inclusive Education & Community Partnership Oxnard, CA F 5.2
HOPE Group LLC Phoenix, AZ F 5.2
Optimae Lifeservices - Keokuk Keokuk, IA F 4.1
New Way Day Services Inc. Doral, FL F 3.9
San Idlefonso / Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM F 3.2
0012-Therapeutic Research and Devel Charlotte, NC F 1.8
Integrated Development Services - Milwaukee Wi Milwaukee, WI F 1.7
MultiCare Behavioral Health (Company 41) Puyallup, WA F 1.7
Community Health Services Anchorage, AK F 1.6
A New Way Professional Services Inc. Doral, FL F 1.3
Dechra Development KS Office Overland Park, KS F 1.2
NSLIJ Research Manhasset, NY F 1.1
PME New Hudson, MI F 1.1
Integrated Development Services - Madison Wi Madison, WI F 1.0
Commonwealth of Virginia Richmond, VA C 0.6
Bevilacqua Research Corporation Huntsville, AL C 0.5
Acuity Brands Lighting Decatur Decatur, GA C 0.4
SWCA, Incorporated Phoenix, AZ B 0.4
SWCA Environmental Consultants Phoenix, AZ B 0.3
Arlington Arlington, VA A 0.1
Sealed Air Charlotte, NC A 0.1
Chestnut Health Systems Lighthouse Normal, IL C 0.0
Crossroads Normal, IL C 0.0
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Social science research and development services?

This sector averages 2.3 against a BLS benchmark of 0.5 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.