Industry profile · NAICS 712130

Zoos

Workplace injury rates across 176 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

176
Employers
7.7
Avg TCR
3.1
BLS benchmark
6,981
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Zoos average 7.7 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.5 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.1.

7.7
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.1
BLS national benchmark
176
employers reporting
6,981
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Zoos Safety Data Reveals

The Zoos sector (NAICS 712130) encompasses 176 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 6,981 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 7.7 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.1 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 7.7 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Zoos that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 3 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Tucson, AZ D 5.7
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc. Tulsa, OK D 5.7
Clearwater Marine Aquarium Clearwater, FL D 5.7
Brooklyn Botanic Garden Corporation Brooklyn, NY D 5.7
Denver Zoological Foundation Denver, CO D 5.7
4829-11805 Honolulu, HI D 5.7
Layton LLC Layton, UT D 5.6
Atlanta Fulton County Zoo, Inc. Atlanta, GA D 5.6
Lake Tobias Wildlife Park Halifax, PA D 5.5
Daniel Jonathan Stowe Conservancy (Daniel Stowe Botanical Garden) Belmont, NC D 5.5
Toledo Zoo Toledo, OH D 5.2
Mt. Cuba Center Hockessin, DE D 5.2
The Morton Arboretum Lisle, IL D 5.1
WCS - Central Park Zoo New York, NY D 5.1
Minnesota Zoo Apple Valley, MN D 5.1
Downtown Aquarium Houston Houston, TX D 4.9
International Center for the Preservation of Wild Animal DBA The Wilds Cumberland, OH D 4.9
John G. Shedd Aquarium Chicago, IL D 4.9
National Aquarium Animal Care and Rescue Center Baltimore, MD D 4.9
Central Park Zoo New York, NY D 4.9
WCS - Bronx Zoo of New York Bronx, NY D 4.8
Houston Zoo, Inc. Houston, TX D 4.7
Huntsville Madison County Botanical Garden Society Inc Huntsville, AL D 4.6
Butterfly Pavilion & Insect Center Westminster, CO D 4.4
The Toledo Zoo Toledo, OH D 4.4
Tennessee Aquarium Chattanooga, TN D 4.3
Monterey Bay Aquarium Monterey, CA D 4.2
North Carolina Aquarium on Roanoke Island Manteo, NC D 4.1
Top of the Rock Ridgedale, MO D 4.0
SeaQuest Managment INC Boise, ID D 4.0
Rolling Hills Wildlife Adventure Salina, KS D 4.0
Zoo and Aquarium Chula Vista, CA D 3.9
Lincoln Park Zoo Chicago, IL D 3.8
National Aquarium Pier 3 Baltimore, MD D 3.8
Snug Harbor Cultural Center & Botanical Garden Staten Island, NY C 3.7
Seneca Park Zoo Society Rochester, NY C 3.7
Isaac W. Bernheim Foundation Clermont, KY C 3.5
Audubon Aquarium of the Americas New Orleans, LA C 3.5
Cleveland Botanical Garden Cleveland, OH C 3.3
Seattle Aquarium Seattle, WA C 3.3
Dallas Arboretum and Botanical Garden Dallas, TX C 3.3
New England Aquarium Boston, MA C 3.3
OHP Springfield, MO C 3.2
Audubon Butterfly Garden and Insectarium New Orleans, LA C 3.2
Dogwood Canyon Lampe, MO C 3.1
Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden Des Moines, IA C 3.1
Folsom LLC Folsom, CA C 2.9
Woodbridge LLC Woodbridge, NJ C 2.9
SEA LIFE Michigan Aquarium Auburn Hills, MI C 2.8
Office Albany, GA C 2.7
← Prev Page 3 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Zoos?

This sector averages 7.7 against a BLS benchmark of 3.1 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.