State profile · OSHA ITA

Michigan workplace safety

How 16,393 OSHA-reporting employers across Michigan compare on workplace injuries, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 14,419 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology).

16,393
Employers
5.3
Avg TCR (rated)
330,220
Injuries (all)
202
Fatalities (all)

TCR, interpreted

Far above average

5.3 avg TCR

Michigan vs all states by OSHA-reporting employer count

Where this state's ITA establishment inventory sits among every tracked state and territory (coverage signal, not a safety ranking)

16,393 9th of 54 higher than 45 of 54 states

States and territories, banded by OSHA ITA reporting employer count

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source official public datasets · 2026

The state picture

Michigan's 14,419 rated reporting employers average 5.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 2.0 times the ~2.7 all-industry private-sector norm.

5.3
avg TCR · rated subset
14,419
rated employers
16,393
all reporting employers
330,220
recordable injuries (all)

Inventory counts and injury/fatality totals cover all 16,393 ITA establishments; the average TCR excludes zero-rate and corrupt-hours filings. See Methodology → Three Populations.

Michigan grade distribution 16,389 graded establishments · width = share

23% of Michigan's reporting establishments earn an F and 16% an A, each measured against its own industry benchmark, not the state line. These grades are a transparent derived index, not an official OSHA rating; see the Methodology for the exact formula.

Where Michigan ranks among states

54 states & territories by avg TCR

Michigan's average TCR of 5.3 is lower than 47% of states, a state average reflects industry mix as much as workplace safety.

Higher avg TCRLower avg TCR

How Michigan Workplaces Compare

Michigan hosts 16,393 employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. These are not small shops: federal rules require ITA submission from workplaces with 250+ employees in any industry, plus workplaces with 20+ employees in the roughly 60 NAICS codes classified as high-hazard (construction, manufacturing, healthcare, warehousing, agriculture, and others). Across this Michigan cohort, workers have logged 330,220 recordable injuries. The published state average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers uses the 14,419 establishments with a credible rate (zero-rate and corrupt-hours filings stay in the inventory counts above but are excluded from the average, see methodology).

The state has recorded 202 workplace fatalities in the reporting window, which is tracked separately from non-fatal injury counts because fatal events have their own investigation trail under 29 CFR 1904.39. Reading state-level TCR requires context: the headline figure is driven by a state's industry mix. A state with a heavy construction, logging, or meatpacking footprint will mechanically post higher TCR than a state dominated by finance or professional services, even when individual employers are equally well-managed. That is why the employer table below sorts each establishment by its own TCR and letter grade, against the BLS benchmark for its specific industry, not against the state average.

For jobseekers, relocators, investors, and local safety professionals, state-level pages function as an entry point: use the grade-sorted list to spot the safest and highest-risk employers in Michigan, then click through to an individual establishment for its year-by-year injury, illness, DART, and fatality trajectory. Compare multiple years before drawing conclusions, a single outlier year can reflect a specific event, whereas a sustained pattern across reporting cycles is a more reliable risk signal. All data comes directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries. State OSHA plans in 22 states operate their own enforcement programs in parallel, but the injury data above is harmonized through the federal ITA system.

Employers in Michigan, by injury rate

Page 279 of 328
EmployerCityIndustryGradeAvg TCR
Brightwing dba Resource Technologies CorporationTroyHelp supply servicesA0.5
Roncelli Inc.Sterling HeightsCommercial building construcA0.5
Belmont Equipment and TechologiesMadison HeightsGeneral-purpose industrial mA0.5
Whaley Steel CorpMioConcrete reinforcement placeA0.5
Linde Inc. Ecorse Plant 719River RougeGases, industrial (i.e., comA0.5
Thunder Bay Community Health Service, Inc. FairviewFairviewCommunity health centers andA0.5
City HallGrand RapidsPersonnel offices, governmenA0.5
Blue Triton Brands, Inc. Product Supply - MecostaStanwoodSpring waters, purifying andA0.5
Metro Consulting Associates, LLC.PlymouthConstruction surveying serviC0.5
Webasto FentonFentonWarm air heating equipment mA0.5
BorgWarner Propulsion Technical CenterAuburn HillsMotor vehicle parts and acceA0.5
Corteva Constantine CON1ConstantineCorn shellingA0.5
Arconic Whitehall Operations - Whitehall HRC ComplexWhitehallNonferrous metals (except alA0.5
New Products CorporationBenton HarborAluminum die-casting foundriA0.5
Gestamp North America IncTroyJob stampings, automotive, mA0.5
Michigan Operations - Hemlock HIMS PlantHemlockSilicone rubber manufacturinA0.5
Truform Machine IncJacksonMachine shopsA0.5
Howmet Aerospace Whitehall Operations - Plant 5WhitehallNonferrous metals (except alA0.5
Flowserve Corporation - Kalamazoo OperationsKalamazooGasket, packing, and sealingA0.5
T & M Asphalt Paving, Inc.MilfordAsphalt paving (i.e., highwaA0.5
Traverse City CBO/CenterTraverse CityDistribution of natural gasA0.5
Pullman SST #79TrentonConcrete repairA0.5
Acoustic Ceiling & Partition Company, Inc. dba Arbor Construction PersonellAnn ArborAcoustical ceiling tile and A0.5
Roemer Utility Services, LLCMancelonaHorizontal drilling (e.g., uA0.5
Cadillac MI FXFE-CADCadillacLess Than Truckload General A0.5
Michigan Scientific CorporationCharlevoixTesting equipment (e.g., abrA0.5
Adient Madison Heights, US LLCMadison HeightsSeats for public conveyancesA0.5
In2gro Technologies LLCPlymouthLow voltage electrical workA0.5
Powell Fabrication & Mfg. LLCSt. LouisChemical processing machinerA0.5
Michigan SenateLansingLegislative bodies (e.g., feA0.5
VisionsFarmingtonHandicapped, schools for, elA0.5
Master Electric Inc.GladwinElectrical, electrical wirinA0.5
Home OfficeZeelandFood service contractors, caA0.5
3940_12733Hudsonville-A0.5
Kasco, LLCRoyal OakAddition, alteration and renA0.5
Berkley High SchoolBerkeyElementary and secondary schA0.5
Pattengill ElementaryBerkleyElementary and secondary schA0.5
Rochester Hills - Research, Test and Development (We do not manufacture)Rochester HillsEngineering research and devC0.5
Mahle Industrial Thermal Systems America, LP WarehouseGrand RapidsRadiators and cores manufactA0.5
Dowagiac CampusDowagiacColleges, communityA0.5
Building 3DearbornEngineering ServicesC0.5
Fisher Dynamics - EastSt. Clair ShoresMotor vehicle seats manufactA0.5
6800 HaggertyCantonAutomotive parts, new, merchA0.5
Lombardo Homes of St LouisShelby TownshipCabin construction general cA0.5
North American Dismantling CorpLapeerDemolition contractorA0.5
StevensvilleStevensvilleGeneral freight trucking, loA0.5
Advance Concrete ProductsHighlandTanks, concrete, manufacturiA0.5
CityFlatsHotel Grand Rapids, LLCGrand RapidsHotels (except casino hotelsA0.5
Dart Container HoltHoltPrinting inks manufacturingA0.5
Airport Community SchoolsCarletonAcademies, elementary or secA0.5
← Prev Page 279 of 328 Next →

Nationwide states with similar injury rates or employer scale

Two PlainSafetyScore-derived peer sets for Michigan: nearest states and territories by rated-subset average Total Case Rate and by OSHA-reporting employer inventory. These are cross-state neighborhoods, not the employer list above.

Similar average TCR

Nearest states by rated-subset Total Case Rate (5.3 here).

Similar employer inventory

Nearest states by reporting employer count (16,393 here).

Look up a Michigan employer → · Compare all states → · How TCR is measured →

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.