Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) · Michigan

Michigan Senate

Lansing, MI · ~383 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Senate runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) workplace, earning a grade A.

Michigan Senate: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Senate safety composite

Michigan Senate scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

Michigan Senate injury rate improved

Michigan Senate's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=1.0 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921120 · Lansing, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #2/8
  • PHOTO Judicial Council of …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~383 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Judicial Council of California (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Senate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Senate averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michigan Senate TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=1 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Michigan Senate falls in its industry

158 Legislative bodies (e.g., fede establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 8 Legislative bodies (e.g., fede employers in Michigan.

Michigan Senate (383 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Senate
Michigan Senate (383 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Michigan Senate has more employees than the Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2019 1.0 0.3 4 0 0
2018 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2016 1.2 0.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921120 · MI · Lansing

158 Legislative bodies (e.g., federal, local, and state) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Judicial Council of California 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4529_10118 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Board of County Supervisors 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN House of Representatives 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE General Mills Reed City Plant 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&W Engineering/Autokiniton 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2434 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE TROY CUSTOMER CARE CTR_1455776 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR Platte Valley Precast 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR VelocityVelocity, A Managed Services Company, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TTCA - Albany 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Peoria Landside 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Willmar Grow Out 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE Montgomery DC 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaufort County Community College 383 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.