TCR, interpreted
Far above average
4.4 avg TCR
State profile · OSHA ITA
How 22,650 OSHA-reporting employers across Ohio compare on workplace injuries, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 19,713 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology).
TCR, interpreted
Far above average
4.4 avg TCR
Ohio vs all states by OSHA-reporting employer count
Where this state's ITA establishment inventory sits among every tracked state and territory (coverage signal, not a safety ranking)
22,650 6th of 54 higher than 48 of 54 states
States and territories, banded by OSHA ITA reporting employer count
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more states. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source official public datasets · 2026
The state picture
Ohio's 19,713 rated reporting employers average 4.4 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.6 times the ~2.7 all-industry private-sector norm.
Inventory counts and injury/fatality totals cover all 22,650 ITA establishments; the average TCR excludes zero-rate and corrupt-hours filings. See Methodology → Three Populations.
16% of Ohio's reporting establishments earn an F and 20% an A, each measured against its own industry benchmark, not the state line. These grades are a transparent derived index, not an official OSHA rating; see the Methodology for the exact formula.
Ohio's average TCR of 4.4 is lower than 89% of states, a state average reflects industry mix as much as workplace safety.
A second cut tells a different story: ranked by rated-subset injury rate alone, Ohio is #7 of 54. Ranked instead by fatalities per rated employer establishment (same 19,713-employer subset), it's #18 of 54, a 11-place swing. A state can run a moderate everyday injury rate while its rarer, most severe incidents cluster differently; the two metrics measure different things on the same population and shouldn't be read as interchangeable.
Ohio hosts 22,650 employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. These are not small shops: federal rules require ITA submission from workplaces with 250+ employees in any industry, plus workplaces with 20+ employees in the roughly 60 NAICS codes classified as high-hazard (construction, manufacturing, healthcare, warehousing, agriculture, and others). Across this Ohio cohort, workers have logged 387,843 recordable injuries. The published state average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.4 injuries per 100 full-time workers uses the 19,713 establishments with a credible rate (zero-rate and corrupt-hours filings stay in the inventory counts above but are excluded from the average, see methodology).
The state has recorded 248 workplace fatalities in the reporting window, which is tracked separately from non-fatal injury counts because fatal events have their own investigation trail under 29 CFR 1904.39. Reading state-level TCR requires context: the headline figure is driven by a state's industry mix. A state with a heavy construction, logging, or meatpacking footprint will mechanically post higher TCR than a state dominated by finance or professional services, even when individual employers are equally well-managed. That is why the employer table below sorts each establishment by its own TCR and letter grade, against the BLS benchmark for its specific industry, not against the state average.
For jobseekers, relocators, investors, and local safety professionals, state-level pages function as an entry point: use the grade-sorted list to spot the safest and highest-risk employers in Ohio, then click through to an individual establishment for its year-by-year injury, illness, DART, and fatality trajectory. Compare multiple years before drawing conclusions, a single outlier year can reflect a specific event, whereas a sustained pattern across reporting cycles is a more reliable risk signal. All data comes directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries. State OSHA plans in 22 states operate their own enforcement programs in parallel, but the injury data above is harmonized through the federal ITA system.
| Employer | City | Industry | Grade | Avg TCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garfield Heights (Cleveland) FS AAT | Garfield Heights | Wall component (i.e., exteri | A | 1.0 |
| Unit #0767 | Sandusky | Retail | A | 1.0 |
| 832000 - Goodwill Easter Seals Main Campus | Dayton | Office Administration | A | 1.0 |
| Huhtamaki New Vienna | New Vienna | Dinnerware, plastics (except | A | 1.0 |
| ADB Safegate | Columbus | Lighting fixtures, airport ( | A | 1.0 |
| tecsis LP | Worthington | Measuring equipment for elec | A | 1.0 |
| West Tusc Warehouse/ Home Medical | Canton | General medical and surgical | A | 1.0 |
| ANCMG Cancer | Canton | General medical and surgical | A | 1.0 |
| Siemens Energy Inc. - Mount Vernon | Mount Vernon | Gas turbine generator set un | A | 1.0 |
| Nestle Development Center | Marysville | Food research and developmen | D | 1.0 |
| Graham Packaging | Findlay | Bottles, plastics, manufactu | A | 1.0 |
| Chemical Division | Springboro | Adhesives (except asphalt, d | A | 1.0 |
| Tiffin Assembly Plant | Tiffin | Boxes, setup (i.e., not ship | A | 0.9 |
| Advanced Industrial Services LLC - Toledo | Toledo | Insulation, boiler, duct and | A | 0.9 |
| Salem Community Hospital Professional Corporation | Salem | General medical and surgical | A | 0.9 |
| Dynalab EMS | Reynoldsburg | Printed circuit Assembly | A | 0.9 |
| Silfex Inc. Eaton Facility | Eaton | Semiconductor devices manufa | A | 0.9 |
| Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus | Groveport | packaging and labeling servi | A | 0.9 |
| Rhinestahl Corporation | Mason | Machine shops | A | 0.9 |
| Cincinnati - 10121 Princeton Glendale Road | Cincinnati | Motor Freight Transportation | A | 0.9 |
| Valley W. Carrollton - Ernst Enterprises, Inc | West Carrollton | Central-mixed concrete manuf | A | 0.9 |
| The Scotts Company - Orrville | Orrville | Growing Media Manufacturing | A | 0.9 |
| Magnetech Industrial Services, Inc. | Massillon | Motor repair and maintenance | A | 0.9 |
| Brechbuhler Scales, Inc. | Canton | Agricultural machinery and e | A | 0.9 |
| CCL Design | Strongsville | Printing, engraving, on pape | A | 0.9 |
| B.G. Trucking & Construction, Inc. | North Lima | Highway construction | A | 0.9 |
| Bhi- Maple Knoll Vi | Cincinnati | - | A | 0.9 |
| Hhealt-Frmc1-Home Health-Main Office | Sandusky | - | A | 0.9 |
| Supply Chain Evendale OH | Cincinnati | - | A | 0.9 |
| Kirila Contractors Inc. | Brookfield | Utility line (i.e., sewer, w | A | 0.9 |
| Momentive Performance Materials Quartz Inc Strongsville | Strongsville | Nonclay refractories (e.g., | A | 0.9 |
| Todhunter | Monroe | Electric Power Distribution | B | 0.9 |
| Store 50 | Mayfield Heights | Used Merchandise | A | 0.9 |
| Rubbermaid | Mogadore | Sponges, plastics, manufactu | A | 0.9 |
| Marc Glassman Inc 62UA | Columbus | Grocery store | A | 0.9 |
| Northwood | Northwood | General warehousing and stor | A | 0.9 |
| The Lytle Park Hotel, Autograph Collection | Cincinnati | Hotel | A | 0.9 |
| Lincoln Knolls Save A Lot | Youngstown | Grocery stores | A | 0.9 |
| Akron Cuyahogo Falls Hospice | Cuyahoga Falls | Health Care Hospice | A | 0.9 |
| W. H. Sammis Plant | Stratton | Electric power generation, f | B | 0.9 |
| CB Manufacturing & Sales Co., Inc. | Miamisburg | Chasers (i.e., a machine too | A | 0.9 |
| Bobby Fisher Distributing | Springfield | Beverages, alcoholic (except | A | 0.9 |
| Bauman Orchards Inc. | Rittman | Apple orchards | A | 0.9 |
| Central Allied Enterprises, Inc. | Canton | Road construction | A | 0.9 |
| Schenck Process LLC - Chagrin Falls | Chagrin Falls | Mineral processing and benef | A | 0.9 |
| Tmx2419 - Cincinnati Com`L | Middletown | - | A | 0.9 |
| DuBois Chemicals dba Lynx Enterprises | Hamilton | Oil additive preparations ma | A | 0.9 |
| Steubenville Service Building | Steubenville | Distribution of electric pow | B | 0.9 |
| OC Science & Technology Center | Granville | Engineering research and dev | D | 0.9 |
| S&A Industries, Akron, Ohio | Akron | Filters (e.g., air, engine o | A | 0.9 |
Two PlainSafetyScore-derived peer sets for Ohio: nearest states and territories by rated-subset average Total Case Rate and by OSHA-reporting employer inventory. These are cross-state neighborhoods, not the employer list above.
Nearest states by rated-subset Total Case Rate (4.4 here).
Nearest states by reporting employer count (22,650 here).
Look up a Ohio employer → · Compare all states → · How TCR is measured →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.