General Warehousing and Storage · Utah

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut

Salt Lake City, UT · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut runs at 325% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade F.

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut: 18.9 TCR = 325% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut safety composite

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2023→2024

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut injury rate improved

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut's TCR fell 7.2 from 22.5 in 2023 to 15.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 22.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=22.5 · 2024=15.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Salt Lake City, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.9 · 325% of ind

  • DART 15.3 DART
  • RANK #88/89
  • PHOTO Rosenberg Ofc/Whse
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rosenberg Ofc/Whse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut averages 18.9 TCR (325% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut TCR series: 2023=22.5 · 2024=15.3 · BLS 5.8

Where 00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 89 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Utah.

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut (25 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut
00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut (25 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

00001093-Ut006b 000258-Salt Lake City, Ut has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.3 15.3 3 0 0
2023 22.5 18.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · UT · Salt Lake City

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rosenberg Ofc/Whse 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Happy Returns - Valencia, CA 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frederick Ofc/Whse 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victoria's Secret & Company Las Vegas Processing Center 18.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 00560 SMITHFIELD SVC CTR 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canyon Kitchen & Bath, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tom's Mechanical Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Crucial Mile Logistics LLC 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohio Farms Packing Company 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dakota Ridge School 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield - Install 18.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE CA-El Nido Substation 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA-SSID - D A Shop 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA-Shaver Lake - Camp Edison 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kala House JR 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.