Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Michigan

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse

Auburn Hills, MI · ~276 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade B.

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse: 2.5 TCR = 73% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse safety composite

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2016→2022

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse injury rate improved

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse's TCR fell 5.6 from 7.0 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 455211 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #74/141
  • PHOTO 205 - Lowell
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~276 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 205 - Lowell (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse averages 2.5 TCR (73% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.4 · BLS 3.4

Where 0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse falls in its industry

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 141 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Michigan.

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse (276 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 100200300400500600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse
0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse (276 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 260 employees and a TCR of 4.8

0376 - Auburn Hills Mi Whse has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.4 0.5 3 0 0
2021 1.5 0.5 3 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 4 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 7 0 0
2016 7.0 7.0 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

455211 · MI · Auburn Hills

1,491 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 205 - Lowell 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 064 - Saline Rd Ann Arbor 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 216 - Standale 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 274 - Grafton WI 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Comau Center 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blackmer-A Dover Resources Co 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE 032 - Canton 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE 042 - Gratiot Rd Saginaw 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Surprise 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR M7252 Singing Rive 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Smyrna Sat 114881 Ga 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fantini Bakery 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1206 - Apex Nc Whse 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0641 - South Austin Tx Whse 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Como 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3rd Ave 276 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.