Mail and Parcel Delivery · California

051944-Culver City Po

Culver City, CA · ~79 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

051944-Culver City Po runs at 327% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

051944-Culver City Po: 14.7 TCR = 327% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

051944-Culver City Po safety composite

051944-Culver City Po scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2017→2022

051944-Culver City Po injury rate improved

051944-Culver City Po's TCR fell 3.6 from 17.9 in 2017 to 14.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 20.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.9 · 2018=16.3 · 2019=20.7 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=14.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Culver City, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.7 · 327% of ind

  • DART 13.0 DART
  • RANK #1168/1240
  • PHOTO CEDAR RAPIDS PDC_144…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CEDAR RAPIDS PDC_1441088 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

051944-Culver City Po in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 051944-Culver City Po averages 14.7 TCR (327% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

051944-Culver City Po TCR series: 2017=17.9 · 2018=16.3 · 2019=20.7 · 2020=10.2 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=14.3 · BLS 4.5

Where 051944-Culver City Po falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1168 safest of 1240 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in California.

051944-Culver City Po (79 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 051944-Culver City Po
051944-Culver City Po (79 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

051944-Culver City Po has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.3 13.0 10 1 0
2021 8.9 8.9 7 0 0
2020 10.2 10.2 7 0 0
2019 20.7 20.7 13 2 0
2018 16.3 16.3 10 3 0
2017 17.9 17.9 9 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · CA · Culver City

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 94 employers in Culver City, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CEDAR RAPIDS PDC_1441088 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR OPA LOCKA_1376180 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEST SALEM_1387178 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUNSET POINT_1438873 14.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crisalida Berry Farms, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE L E Cooke Co 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOBI'S 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sony Pictures Entertainment 3,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 567 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Culver City / Westside 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - CULVER CITY 1,032 FTE
NAT-TCR 114 Brandon (Tampa) 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR New System Linen Service Inc. 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The A Johnson Co., LLC 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodford Logistics - PA 14.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 317288-Ren-Sierra Sta 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 072884-Eng-Main Office Sta 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 485393-Lub-Freedom Sta 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 142407-Hnl-Kapalama Sta 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.