Fitness centers · California

11 Ceres

Ceres, CA · ~31 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

11 Ceres runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fitness centers workplace, earning a grade F.

11 Ceres: 6.3 TCR = 204% of Fitness centers BLS 3.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

11 Ceres safety composite

11 Ceres scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.4

2018→2020

11 Ceres injury rate improved

11 Ceres's TCR fell 13.4 from 13.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.4 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713940 · Ceres, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.3 · 204% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #112/190
  • PHOTO Greater Burlington Y…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greater Burlington YMCA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

11 Ceres in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 11 Ceres averages 6.3 TCR (204% of the Fitness centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

11 Ceres TCR series: 2018=13.4 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.1

Where 11 Ceres falls in its industry

629 Fitness centers establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #112 safest of 190 Fitness centers employers in California.

11 Ceres (31 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 11 Ceres
11 Ceres (31 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2

11 Ceres has fewer employees than the Fitness centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 13.4 13.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713940 · CA · Ceres

629 Fitness centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 61 employers in Ceres, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greater Burlington YMCA 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weatherford,TX 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crunch - Alhambra 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanover Area YMCA 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GCF 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nielsen Farms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Star Nurseries LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Growers Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-227 914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bronco Wine Company 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dan Avila & Sons - Farming 564 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1983 390 FTE
NAT-TCR Bi-State Construction Co., Inc., Easton, PA 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Stock Yards / Birmingham 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Schayes, Inc dba New York Sash 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hanover 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hazmat Mobile 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Transport - 150 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smithfield Direct- South Florida 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Viatek Solutions, Clearwater 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.