Watermelon farming, field, bedding plant and seed production · California

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming

Ceres, CA · ~564 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Watermelon farming, field, bedding plant and seed production workplace, earning a grade D.

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming: 8.1 TCR = 179% of Watermelon farming, field, bedding plant and seed production BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming safety composite

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2019→2024

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming injury rate improved

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming's TCR fell 3.3 from 8.8 in 2019 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.8 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=11.6 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Ceres, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.1 · 179% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #132/175
  • PHOTO Fagerberg Produce Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 94 inj
  • SIZE ~564 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fagerberg Produce Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dan Avila & Sons - Farming averages 8.1 TCR (179% of the Watermelon farming, field, bedding plant and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming TCR series: 2019=8.8 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=11.6 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Dan Avila & Sons - Farming falls in its industry

331 Watermelon farming, field, bed establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #132 safest of 175 Watermelon farming, field, bed employers in California.

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming (564 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dan Avila & Sons - Farming
Dan Avila & Sons - Farming (564 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Dan Avila & Sons - Farming has more employees than the Watermelon farming, field, bedding plant median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 4.4 15 0 0
2023 6.4 4.7 15 0 0
2022 8.2 8.2 16 0 0
2021 11.6 11.6 19 1 0
2020 8.1 3.5 14 0 0
2019 8.8 8.8 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · CA · Ceres

331 Watermelon farming, field, bedding plant and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 61 employers in Ceres, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fagerberg Produce Inc 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Donald W Beeman 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rio Farms 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neil Bassetti Farms, LLC 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wish Farms CA - Salinas 564 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Service L.L.C. 564 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mariani Nut Company 564 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sierra Nevada Brewing Company 564 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-227 914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bronco Wine Company 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1983 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGB Construction inc 363 FTE
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Institute of Tucson 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Denton Plastics, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvest Sherwood Food Distributors Cleveland 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA - Chocolate Bayou Works 564 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jordan Carriers 564 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schaeffler Group USA Inc. - Cheraw 2 564 FTE
NAT-SIZE NISCO-Topeka 564 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.