General Warehouse and Storage · Arizona
185-DC185
PHOENIX, AZ · ~550 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.9
- Avg TCR
- 5.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
185-DC185 runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate — far safer than the typical General Warehouse and Storage workplace — earning a grade A.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 5.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 30
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares 185-DC185's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 9 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
185-DC185's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 5.8 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 493110.
Where 185-DC185 falls in its industry
10,728 General Warehouse and Storage establishmentsSafer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.
185-DC185 has an average TCR of 0.9, which is 16% of the industry average (5.8) for General Warehouse and Storage. This is significantly better than average.
Safety Insights for 185-DC185
185-DC185 operates an establishment with approximately 550 full-time equivalent workers in PHOENIX, AZ, classified under the General Warehouse and Storage industry (NAICS 493110). Across 9 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 30 recordable injuries, 5 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 0.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the A letter grade (Excellent Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 5.8 for General Warehouse and Storage, 185-DC185's workforce experiences 16% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 9 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating 185-DC185 as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from 185-DC185's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 493110 — General Warehouse and Storage.
DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 811,770 hours worked = 0.74 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 185-DC185 (this establishment) | 0.93 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 9-year avg |
| Warehousing and storage, general merchandise industry avg | 5.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 493110 |
| Arizona state avg (all industries) | 4.73 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by 185-DC185 to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 4 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 8 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 3 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 5 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 6 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on 185-DC185's reported OSHA injury record — strong versus its General Warehouse and Storage peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 16% of the General Warehouse and Storage benchmark, 185-DC185 reports fewer injuries than typical peers — still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider General Warehouse and Storage sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is 185-DC185's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has 185-DC185 reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.