General Warehousing and Storage · Texas

1916 Ros1000

Rosenberg, TX · ~167 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

1916 Ros1000 runs at 447% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.9
avg TCR · per 100 workers
5.8
industry benchmark (BLS)
101
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares 1916 Ros1000's OSHA Total Case Rate of 25.9 to the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark of 5.8 (447% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

1916 Ros1000's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 5.8 industry benchmark.

010203040 202220232024 31.75.8 Industry benchmark1916 Ros1000 TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 493110.

Where 1916 Ros1000 falls in its industry

10,728 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #982 safest of 984 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Texas.

Trend analysis for 1916 Ros1000

Between 2022 and 2024, 1916 Ros1000's Total Case Rate worsened from 27.8 to 31.7 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 14% increase across 2 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2023, at a TCR of 18.3, while 2024 saw the highest rate, at 31.7, a spread of 13.4 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 3 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 3 reporting years, 1916 Ros1000 recorded 101 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 101 injuries, 4 illnesses shown on this page for 1916 Ros1000 are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 493110 - General Warehousing and Storage.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

43 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 290,603 hours worked = 29.59 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
1916 Ros1000 (this establishment) 25.90 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg
Warehousing and storage, general merchandise industry avg 5.80 BLS IIF, NAICS 493110
Texas state avg (all industries) 3.73 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by 1916 Ros1000 to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 31.7 29.6 43 3 0
2023 18.3 18.3 23 1 0
2022 27.8 27.8 35 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on 1916 Ros1000's reported OSHA injury record versus its General Warehousing and Storage peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 447% of the General Warehousing and Storage benchmark, 1916 Ros1000 reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider General Warehousing and Storage sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is 1916 Ros1000's safety grade?
1916 Ros1000 has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 25.9 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 5.8 for General Warehousing and Storage.
How many injuries has 1916 Ros1000 reported?
1916 Ros1000 has reported 101 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 3 years of OSHA data (2024, 2023, 2022). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Texas, and by nearby establishments in Rosenberg - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.