Employer · California

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr

Rancho Cucamonga, CA · ~127 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr: 6.1 TCR = 135% of industry BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr safety composite

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2022→2024

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr injury rate improved

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr's TCR fell 3.7 from 8.3 in 2022 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=8.3 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 135% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #171/218
  • PHOTO Greenville
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr averages 6.1 TCR (135% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr TCR series: 2022=8.3 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 4.5

Where 300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr falls in its industry

3,252 industry establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #171 safest of 218 industry employers in California.

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr (127 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr
300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr (127 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

300000765902266 - CA-Rancho Cucamonga-Field Office Dayton Dr has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 4.6 6 0 0
2023 5.3 4.0 8 0 0
2022 8.3 7.0 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · CA · Rancho Cucamonga

3,252 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 229 employers in Rancho Cucamonga, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenville 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CID LTL 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Counties Terminals Inc dba Griley Airfreight 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harms Pacific Transport Inc 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Christensen & Giannini LLC 1588 Moffett St., Ste B 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hokto Kinoko Company 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Booth Ranches LLC - BR2 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3019_5835 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 304 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davis Development Company, Inc. 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR CUCAMONGA 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR VIP,INC. Rancho Cucamonga 751 FTE
NAT-TCR Lees Summit 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Accurate Brazing Corporation 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Coon Rapids 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kendal-Crosslands Communities 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pershing 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE EasTex Tower 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Education Center 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0141 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.