Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

Kendal-Crosslands Communities

Kennett Square, PA · ~604 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kendal-Crosslands Communities runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Kendal-Crosslands Communities: 6.1 TCR = 159% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kendal-Crosslands Communities safety composite

Kendal-Crosslands Communities scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kendal-Crosslands Communities: 5.0 → 8.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 8.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.3× in 2024

Kendal-Crosslands Communities's TCR rose 3.6 from 5.0 in 2016 to 8.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Kennett Square, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 159% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #97/257
  • PHOTO The Piedmont at Buck…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 216 inj
  • SIZE ~604 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Piedmont at Buckhead (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Kendal-Crosslands Communities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kendal-Crosslands Communities averages 6.1 TCR (159% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kendal-Crosslands Communities TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=7.1 · 2024=8.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Kendal-Crosslands Communities falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #97 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

Kendal-Crosslands Communities (604 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kendal-Crosslands Communities
Kendal-Crosslands Communities (604 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Kendal-Crosslands Communities has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.5 1.8 22 20 0
2023 7.1 3.5 31 0 0
2022 5.5 1.7 23 0 0
2021 3.2 1.4 13 1 0
2020 4.9 2.2 18 4 0
2019 5.8 2.8 25 0 0
2018 8.8 4.2 38 0 0
2017 5.8 2.6 25 0 0
2016 5.0 4.5 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Kennett Square

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 55 employers in Kennett Square, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Piedmont at Buckhead 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Devonshire Chatsworth 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Andrews Assisted Living at Francis Plance 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garden Villas South 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 0401 MANHEIM PENNSYLVANIA 1190 LANCASTER RD 604 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prospect Airport Services PHL 604 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camp Hill - Utley Drive 604 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hershey Company - Lancaster Facility 605 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaolin Mushroom Farm 663 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Mill Champs 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tri-M Group, LLC 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Tri-M Group, LLC 484 FTE
NAT-TCR ACME Metal Spinning 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR EFC Systems, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Elizabethton 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BTC El Paso 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 540-FC004 604 FTE
NAT-SIZE NC_Morrisville_101 Innovation Ave._0RDC1010 604 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frankfort Core Plant 604 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Air Lines - SFO 604 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.