Mail and Parcel Delivery · North Carolina

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta

Asheville, NC · ~120 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade C.

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta: 3.6 TCR = 80% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta safety composite

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2022

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta injury rate improved

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta's TCR fell 2.5 from 5.1 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.1 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Asheville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #85/422
  • PHOTO NORCROSS_1375187
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NORCROSS_1375187 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta averages 3.6 TCR (80% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta TCR series: 2017=5.1 · 2018=5 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.6 · BLS 4.5

Where 360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 422 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in North Carolina.

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta (120 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta
360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta (120 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

360307-Ash- West Asheville Sta has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.6 2.6 2 1 0
2021 3.4 2.5 4 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 4.6 4.6 5 0 0
2018 5.0 5.0 5 1 0
2017 5.1 3.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · NC · Asheville

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 290 employers in Asheville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NORCROSS_1375187 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FORT LEAVENWORTH_1435559 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUMMERALL_1383892 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GAITHERSBURG_1364318 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lumbee River EMC 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Carolina Department of Adult Correction Central Engineering 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sugarcreek Construction LLC 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glover Construction Co. 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Hospital; MH Hospital Manager, LLC 8,097 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biltmore Workforce Management 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Care Partners 1,018 FTE
NAT-TCR 121386-Canton Po 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 268359-Stp-Vadnais Heights Anx 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 055450-Noh-Studio City Br 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 056869-Sjc-Blossom Hill Sta 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 453623-Gvl-Calvin Street Anx 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE 122442-Decatur Po 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE 126336-Newnan Po 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE 121233-Buf-East Carrier Anx 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.