Farm labor contractors · California

4 Suns Farm Labor Service

Mcfarland, CA · ~299 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4 Suns Farm Labor Service runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Farm labor contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

4 Suns Farm Labor Service: 2.2 TCR = 48% of Farm labor contractors BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4 Suns Farm Labor Service safety composite

4 Suns Farm Labor Service scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2024

4 Suns Farm Labor Service injury rate improved

4 Suns Farm Labor Service's TCR fell 0.6 from 4.3 in 2017 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Mcfarland, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 48% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #148/620
  • PHOTO YN NUNEZ LABOR CONT…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~299 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: YN NUNEZ LABOR CONTRACTING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

4 Suns Farm Labor Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4 Suns Farm Labor Service averages 2.2 TCR (48% of the Farm labor contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4 Suns Farm Labor Service TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 4.5

Where 4 Suns Farm Labor Service falls in its industry

836 Farm labor contractors establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #148 safest of 620 Farm labor contractors employers in California.

4 Suns Farm Labor Service (299 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 4 Suns Farm Labor Service
4 Suns Farm Labor Service (299 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

4 Suns Farm Labor Service has more employees than the Farm labor contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 1.2 6 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 1.7 1.1 2 1 0
2021 1.9 1.9 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.6 0.5 1 7 0
2018 1.5 0.0 0 4 0
2017 4.3 1.2 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Mcfarland

836 Farm labor contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 37 employers in Mcfarland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR YN NUNEZ LABOR CONTRACTING 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlyle Farms LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peterson Ranch 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FOUR SEASONS PRODUCE PACKING COMPANY, INC. - AZ 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peri & Sons Farms of California, LLC 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terra Bella 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colorado Farms LLC. 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Leal 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR DURAN CONTRACTING INC 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR PULIDO FARMS INC 991 FTE
CITY-NEAR FELIX LABOR CONTRACTING, INC 921 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenview Farming. Inc 389 FTE
NAT-TCR Kaufman Engineered Systems 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Indianapolis Private Fleet in 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Maples Industries 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Home2 Suites Charles Town 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gentzler Electrical Services, Inc 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE Counseling Service of Addison County, Inc. 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE 520 Crofton SE 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations - New Orleans 299 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.