Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly · Wisconsin

414 - Aspire Senior Living

Name: 414 - Aspire Senior Living Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Kimberly, WI · ~60 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 6.6
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

414 - Aspire Senior Living runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly workplace, earning a grade D.

414 - Aspire Senior Living: 6.6 TCR = 175% of Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

414 - Aspire Senior Living safety composite

414 - Aspire Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers
DART rate: C 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2019→2020

414 - Aspire Senior Living injury rate improved

414 - Aspire Senior Living's TCR fell 0.5 from 6.9 in 2019 to 6.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.9 · 2020=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Kimberly, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 175% of ind

DART 2.1 DART
RANK #154/273
PHOTO Braemar Living at Wa…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Braemar Living at Wallkill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

This site

6.6
Braemar Living

6.6
Gardens of Pam

6.6
Crescent Landi

6.6
Cedarbrook of

6.6

What this shows 414 - Aspire Senior Living averages 6.6 TCR (175% of the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly BLS benchmark).

414 - Aspire Senior Living TCR series: 2019=6.9 · 2020=6.4 · BLS 3.8

Where 414 - Aspire Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities for establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #154 safest of 273 Assisted Living Facilities for employers in Wisconsin.

414 - Aspire Senior Living (60 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

414 - Aspire Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted Living Facilities for the Elder median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2020	6.4	2.1	2	1	0
2019	6.9	4.6	3	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Kimberly

6,510 Assisted Living Facilities for the Elderly employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 20 employers in Kimberly, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Braemar Living at Wallkill	MIDDLETOWN, NY	6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Gardens of Pamlico	GRANTSBORO, NC	6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg	HATTIESBURG, MS	6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cedarbrook of Northville	PLYMOUTH, MI	6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Rock Prairie Dairy LLC	AVALON	60 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Steigerwaldt Land Services, Inc.	TOMAHAWK	60 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Valley Power Plant	MILWAUKEE	60 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Horizon Construction Group	MADISON	60 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Crane Engineering	Kimberly	113 FTE
CITY-NEAR	US AutoForce Kimberly	Kimberly	97 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HSL 14, LLC	Kimberly	86 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Luvata Appleton Carter Ct.	Kimberly	80 FTE
NAT-TCR	Booneville	Booneville, AR	6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Ecumen of Litchfield	Litchfield, MN	6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Moonachie Production	Moonachie, NJ	6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	SCD	Chino, CA	6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Rod Baker Ford Sales, Inc.	Plainfield, IL	60 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Anthem Murrieta Management, LLC	Murrieta, CA	60 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Mitchell Ford	Mitchell, SD	60 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Mitchell GM	Mitchell, SD	60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.