Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Gardens of Pamlico

Grantsboro, NC · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gardens of Pamlico runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Gardens of Pamlico: 6.6 TCR = 175% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gardens of Pamlico safety composite

Gardens of Pamlico scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.0

2016→2024

Gardens of Pamlico injury rate improved

Gardens of Pamlico's TCR fell 18.0 from 18.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Grantsboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 175% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #204/356
  • PHOTO Braemar Living at Wa…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Braemar Living at Wallkill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Gardens of Pamlico in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gardens of Pamlico averages 6.6 TCR (175% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gardens of Pamlico TCR series: 2016=18 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=9.2 · 2021=4 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Gardens of Pamlico falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #204 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Gardens of Pamlico (32 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gardens of Pamlico
Gardens of Pamlico (32 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Gardens of Pamlico has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2021 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 9.2 4.6 2 0 0
2019 13.3 0.0 4 0 0
2018 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2016 18.0 14.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Grantsboro

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 8 employers in Grantsboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Braemar Living at Wallkill 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarbrook of Northville 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 414 - Aspire Senior Living 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE T.C. Smith Produce Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE LATHAMS NURSERY INC. - MONROE, NC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Wendell Farming Co. LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7238 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7238 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grantsbrook Nursing & Rehabilitation 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grantsbrook Nursing & Rehab 87 FTE
NAT-TCR K-Construction Inc 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place Tucson Central 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Naples Mazda 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Evolved By Nature Walpole 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE D-M Products Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Logoplaste Hazleton LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enterprise 542M 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9000-DRC-BRUNSWICK 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.