CORRUGATED AND SOLID FIBER BOX MANUFACTURING · Missouri

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging

St. Louis, MO · ~71 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical CORRUGATED AND SOLID FIBER BOX MANUFACTURING workplace, earning a grade D.

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging: 4.2 TCR = 127% of CORRUGATED AND SOLID FIBER BOX MANUFACTURING BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging safety composite

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2021→2022

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging injury rate improved

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging's TCR fell 3.2 from 5.8 in 2021 to 2.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.8 · 2022=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 127% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #32/36
  • PHOTO U.S. Display Group -…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: U.S. Display Group - California (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging averages 4.2 TCR (127% of the CORRUGATED AND SOLID FIBER BOX MANUFACTURING BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging TCR series: 2021=5.8 · 2022=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where 4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging falls in its industry

1,338 CORRUGATED AND SOLID FIBER BOX establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 36 CORRUGATED AND SOLID FIBER BOX employers in Missouri.

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging (71 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate 4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging
4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging (71 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

4583 St Louis Food Service Packaging has fewer employees than the CORRUGATED AND SOLID FIBER BOX MANUFACTU median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2021 5.8 1.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MO · St. Louis

1,338 CORRUGATED AND SOLID FIBER BOX MANUFACTURING employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR U.S. Display Group - California 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Imperial Div. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Packaging : RED BLUFF 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4366 Portland OR Container 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lincoln County Egg Farm 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Matthews, MO 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - St. Joseph Service Center 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE FFCS Field 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon Delivery 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Hca-Henrico Doctors - Forest C 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Chicago Public Schools Ifm 2 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PBI104 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodrich Corporation (Louisville KY) 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manheim Cincinnati 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crawford Sprinkler Co of Raleigh 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Louis Park 4916 Excelsior 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.