HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER · Maryland

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick

Frederick, MD · ~109 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER workplace, earning a grade B.

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick: 1.9 TCR = 61% of HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER BLS 3.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick safety composite

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick held a steady TCR band

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713940 · Frederick, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO PF Hampton Township …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PF Hampton Township Fitness, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 49-Usf-Olf North Frederick averages 1.9 TCR (61% of the HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.1

Where 49-Usf-Olf North Frederick falls in its industry

629 HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER employers in Maryland.

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick (109 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 49-Usf-Olf North Frederick
49-Usf-Olf North Frederick (109 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2

49-Usf-Olf North Frederick has more employees than the HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.1 0.0 0 1 0
2020 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713940 · MD · Frederick

629 HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 267 employers in Frederick, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PF Hampton Township Fitness, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson,KS 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR EOS Fitness - Las Vegas Durango 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rush Copley Healthplex, LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ellsworth Electric, Inc. 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Intralox LLC - Sparrows Point 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friendship Dental Laboratories, LLC 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization, Inc. (OPDC) 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR MD-03 4,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing Center 775 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick, MD (BID - Executive Way) 568 FTE
NAT-TCR Saver Group,Inc dba Olive Hill Save-A-Lot 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Benchemark Printing Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Waterview Nursing Care Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri Pointe Homes Houston 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kamadulski Excavating and Grading 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE CB JENI Homes, LLC 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Radiant Vision Systems, LLC 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE LioChem, Inc. 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.