Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) · Michigan

515 N. Michigan

Saginaw, MI · ~282 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

515 N. Michigan runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) workplace, earning a grade C.

515 N. Michigan: 3.8 TCR = 99% of Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

515 N. Michigan safety composite

515 N. Michigan scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2024

515 N. Michigan injury rate improved

515 N. Michigan's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 18.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=18.6 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Saginaw, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 99% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/42
  • PHOTO Hospital/MOB
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~282 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hospital/MOB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

515 N. Michigan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 515 N. Michigan averages 3.8 TCR (99% of the Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

515 N. Michigan TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=18.6 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where 515 N. Michigan falls in its industry

1,390 Rehabilitation hospitals (exce establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 42 Rehabilitation hospitals (exce employers in Michigan.

515 N. Michigan (282 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 515 N. Michigan
515 N. Michigan (282 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

515 N. Michigan has more employees than the Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcohol median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 5 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 2 1 0
2020 18.6 18.0 0 32 1
2019 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2018 3.1 2.7 7 0 0
2017 2.7 2.3 7 0 0
2016 4.8 3.6 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · MI · Saginaw

1,390 Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 278 employers in Saginaw, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hospital/MOB 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Clinic Rehabilitation Hospital - Edwin Shaw (Akron) 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Dallas, Inc. (Dallas Downtown) 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barix Clinics of Pennsylvania, LLC 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Calumet 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilite Whitehall 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE LECO Corporation -- Headquarters 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Seating Company 282 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nexteer Automotive Saginaw Site 4,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 700 Cooper 2,129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morley - Saginaw 2,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caravan Facilities Management 1,677 FTE
NAT-TCR Hospice & Palliative Care Charlotte Region 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR IHG Army Hotels - Fort Jackson (Holiday Inn Express/Army Lodging) 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Richmond Plant 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Municipal Services Division 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE SH - Building C 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE UMC Delta Point 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fisk Electric Company - Miami, FL 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE SHIROKI North America - Dalton 282 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.