General warehousing and storage · South Carolina

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc

Greenville, SC · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc: 2.9 TCR = 49% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc safety composite

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc: 0.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.42× in 2024

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc's TCR rose 4.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.9 · 49% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #82/160
  • PHOTO Gilmer Warehouse Coc…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gilmer Warehouse Cochran (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc averages 2.9 TCR (49% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=3 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=4 · BLS 5.8

Where 70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 160 General warehousing and storag employers in South Carolina.

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc (33 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc
70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc (33 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

70594 Capstone - Adusa Sp Mauldin Sc has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2023 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · SC · Greenville

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gilmer Warehouse Cochran 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Expeditors International of Washington CVG Distribution 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5852 JOLIET SDC NORTH 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ralph Lauren Corporation - HPD Fulfillment Center 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE BEC- Johns Island Facility 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE MYRTLE BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Resource Center PNG 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hogan Construction - Greenville 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Seacrest Assisted Living 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mechanical Comfort, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR JJID, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR IA Council Bluffs/SelecTrucks 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fleenor Paper Company 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aviation Fabricators, Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creekside Springs LLC - Ambridge 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Neal Scoggins, Inc. 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.