Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Kansas

Lee Aerospace, Inc.

Wichita, KS · ~214 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lee Aerospace, Inc. runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Lee Aerospace, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lee Aerospace, Inc. safety composite

Lee Aerospace, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Lee Aerospace, Inc. injury rate improved

Lee Aerospace, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Wichita, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #12/32
  • PHOTO AES Arconic Big Lake
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~214 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AES Arconic Big Lake (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Lee Aerospace, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lee Aerospace, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lee Aerospace, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=3 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Lee Aerospace, Inc. falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 32 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Kansas.

Lee Aerospace, Inc. (214 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lee Aerospace, Inc.
Lee Aerospace, Inc. (214 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Lee Aerospace, Inc. has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2023 3.0 2.4 5 0 0
2022 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2019 2.5 1.1 7 0 0
2018 3.5 1.3 7 1 0
2017 2.4 0.8 6 0 0
2016 2.6 1.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · KS · Wichita

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 841 employers in Wichita, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AES Arconic Big Lake 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Freeman Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6362-NGAS-Y798 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix DC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Great Plains Manufacturing Abilene East Plant 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDL Electric - Support Activities for Rail Transportation 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Garden Terrace of Overland Park 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Scott 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Aerosystems 11,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Medical Center 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-TCR Heggem-Lundquist 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Celina 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt & Whitney - Columbus Forge Plant 2 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Auburn AL Yard 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Circle Graphics - Raleigh 10700 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Methodist Home of the South Georgia Conference Inc - Macon Campus 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE AAF Flanders Columbia 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE WATERTOWN 214 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.