Employer · Minnesota

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina

Edina, MN · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical industry workplace, earning a grade C.

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina: 8.7 TCR = 116% of industry BLS 7.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina safety composite

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.7

2022→2024

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina injury rate improved

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina's TCR fell 15.7 from 20.9 in 2022 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 20.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=20.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Edina, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 8.7 · 116% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #194/249
  • PHOTO Pullman Regional Hos…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pullman Regional Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina averages 8.7 TCR (116% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina TCR series: 2022=20.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 7.5

Where Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina falls in its industry

6,862 industry establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #194 safest of 249 industry employers in Minnesota.

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina (47 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina
Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina (47 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina has fewer employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 20.9 18.2 1 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MN · Edina

6,862 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 201 employers in Edina, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pullman Regional Hospital 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2643-26340001-263401 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR York Correctional Institute 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10810000 WESTSIDE HOSPITAL 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Staples 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Campbell 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willmar Live Haul 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV Southdale Hospital 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schoenecker's Inc d.b.a BI WORLDWIDE 1,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Fire Protection Group 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2313 - Edina 621 FTE
NAT-TCR Maryland 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Michelman Steel Enterprises. LLC 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ames Ia - 3356 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 231 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Area Disposal Service inc. Clinton HC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE All American Poly of Georgia 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sierra Pacific Distribution Services 3731 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.