Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley

Lancaster, CA · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley runs at 666% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley: 25.3 TCR = 666% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley safety composite

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−27.3

2022→2024

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley injury rate improved

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley's TCR fell 27.3 from 36.0 in 2022 to 8.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 36.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=36.0 · 2023=31.2 · 2024=8.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lancaster, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.3 · 666% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #622/635
  • PHOTO Traditions of Cross …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Traditions of Cross Keys (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley averages 25.3 TCR (666% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley TCR series: 2022=36 · 2023=31.2 · 2024=8.7 · BLS 3.8

Where PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #622 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley (47 employees, TCR 25.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley
PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley (47 employees, TCR 25.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

PSL-The Havens at Antelope Valley has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.7 6.6 4 0 0
2023 31.2 0.0 6 0 0
2022 36.0 3.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Lancaster

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Traditions of Cross Keys 25.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Residence at great woods 25.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairwinds Redmond 25.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amaran Senior Living 25.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Valley Union High School District 3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 549 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State Prison-Los Angeles County 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYD Coach & Bus LLC 679 FTE
NAT-TCR Wenatchee #164 25.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gogebic County 25.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-Atlantic Steel Erectors, Inc. 25.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ABQ - Ground Ops 25.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE All American Poly of Georgia 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abbott Northwestern General Medicine Associates Edina 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HDE2 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Area Disposal Service inc. Clinton HC 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.