Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Tennessee

Abe's Garden Community

Nashville, TN · ~160 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Abe's Garden Community runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Abe's Garden Community: 5.3 TCR = 139% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Abe's Garden Community safety composite

Abe's Garden Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Abe's Garden Community: 1.7 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.26× in 2024

Abe's Garden Community's TCR rose 1.7 from 1.7 in 2021 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Nashville, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 139% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #39/100
  • PHOTO Brookdale Hickory NE
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Hickory NE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Abe's Garden Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Abe's Garden Community averages 5.3 TCR (139% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Abe's Garden Community TCR series: 2021=1.7 · 2022=10.4 · 2023=5.6 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Abe's Garden Community falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Tennessee.

Abe's Garden Community (160 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Abe's Garden Community
Abe's Garden Community (160 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Abe's Garden Community has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 1.4 5 0 0
2023 5.6 5.6 7 0 0
2022 10.4 8.8 13 0 0
2021 1.7 0.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TN · Nashville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,187 employers in Nashville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Hickory NE 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10968 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillhaven 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Discovery Village at the Forum 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 500 Administration Barnhart Plant Services LLC 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dealers Warehouse Corporation-Powell 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wisco Envelope Company 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5503 Chattanooga Offset 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallon Enterprises, LLC 15,267 FTE
CITY-NEAR METROPOLITAN GOVT. OF NASHVILLE,& DAVIDSON COUNTY 10,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR METRO NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Centennial Medical Center 3,106 FTE
NAT-TCR Lafayette Sales Location 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cutrale Citrus Juices USA, Inc. - Leesburg, FL 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S & W Ops, LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trulieve Jefferson County 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Astro Logistics LLC 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Alianza, LP 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE 755-PL001 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Camby in - 3167 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.