Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Washington

ACCRA Manufacturing

Name: ACCRA Manufacturing Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Bothell, WA · ~78 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.2
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ACCRA Manufacturing runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

ACCRA Manufacturing: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ACCRA Manufacturing safety composite

ACCRA Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ACCRA Manufacturing: 1.5 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

ACCRA Manufacturing's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.5 in 2020 to 2.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Bothell, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #17/47
PHOTO UTAS LandingSystems
BOOK 3y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UTAS LandingSystems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.2
UTAS LandingSy

1.2
Kaman Integrat

1.2
Piedmont Propu

1.2
Accurus Aerosp

1.2

What this shows ACCRA Manufacturing averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

ACCRA Manufacturing TCR series: 2020=1.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=2 · BLS 3.3

Where ACCRA Manufacturing falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 47 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Washington.

ACCRA Manufacturing (78 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

ACCRA Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	2.0	0.0	1
2021	0.0	0.0	0
2020	1.5	0.8	2

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · WA · Bothell

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 101 employers in Bothell, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	UTAS LandingSystems	PUEBLO, CO	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Kaman Integrated Structures and Metallics	JACKSONVILLE, FL	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC	WINSTON SALEM, NC	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken	KENT, WA	1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Baker Produce, Inc	PASCO	78 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Bay Baby Produce, Inc.	MOUNT VERNON	78 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Seattle Shellfish	OLYMPIA	78 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc.	SUMNER	78 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Philips Healthcare	Bothell	2,166 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Philips	Bothell	1,495 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Philips North America LLC	Bothell	1,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Bristol Myers Squibb Cell Therapy Operations	Bothell	610 FTE
NAT-TCR	34-Emcaz-Lv Mazda	Las Vegas, NV	1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sheltered Workshop	St. Louis, MO	1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Schneider Electric - Seneca	Seneca, SC	1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	NV.LAS V.103 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc.	Las Vegas, NV	1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	IST - Industrial Skilled Trades	Elgin, IL	78 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Balco Wichita	Wichita, KS	78 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Gelson's Markets #5	Tarzana, CA	78 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Onion Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	Austin, TX	78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.