Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Washington

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken

Kent, WA · ~64 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken safety composite

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2018

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken injury rate improved

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.4 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Kent, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/47
  • PHOTO Kaman Integrated Str…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kaman Integrated Structures and Metallics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 47 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Washington.

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken (64 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken
Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken (64 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.4 2.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · WA · Kent

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 367 employers in Kent, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kaman Integrated Structures and Metallics 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACCRA Manufacturing 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rohr, Inc. (San Marcos TX) 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE El Oro Cattle Feeders LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sagebrush Ranches LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bell Substation 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kennewick General Office 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Origin 3,939 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BFI4 2,994 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFI4 2,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA006 2,529 FTE
NAT-TCR Space Systems Group Gilbert 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Westbrook Dental Lab 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Presence Nazarethville 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Division #16 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sandrock Ridge Care & Rehabilitation 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE State Farm Frederick MD 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn San Francisco 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.