Aircraft propellers and parts manufacturing · North Carolina

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC

Winston Salem, NC · ~55 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft propellers and parts manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Aircraft propellers and parts manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC safety composite

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC held a steady TCR band

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Winston Salem, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/14
  • PHOTO Kaman Integrated Str…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kaman Integrated Structures and Metallics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Aircraft propellers and parts manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC falls in its industry

650 Aircraft propellers and parts establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 14 Aircraft propellers and parts employers in North Carolina.

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC (55 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC
Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC (55 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Piedmont Propulsion Systems, LLC has fewer employees than the Aircraft propellers and parts manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.7 4.7 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · NC · Winston Salem

650 Aircraft propellers and parts manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 255 employers in Winston Salem, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kaman Integrated Structures and Metallics 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Ken 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACCRA Manufacturing 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rohr, Inc. (San Marcos TX) 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Battleboro Produce Inc 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whitaker Farms LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenleaf Nursery Company 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sutton Energy Complex 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - Winston Campus 13,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wake Forest University Health Sciences 3,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - 9040 Team Support Center 1,813 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - Team Support Center 859 FTE
NAT-TCR Ridge Family Center For Learning 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PreferredOne Administrative Services 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Covanta Essex Company 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Vonore Glass Plant 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE El Paso Multi Use 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gittleman Construction and Maintenance 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vermillion Community College 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE BWE LLC, East Hartford, CT 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.