Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing · California

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc.

San Jose, CA · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. runs at 468% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc.: 15.4 TCR = 468% of Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. safety composite

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2018→2019

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. injury rate improved

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 16.5 in 2018 to 14.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=16.5 · 2019=14.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 468% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #95/98
  • PHOTO EMPIRE SHEET METAL, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EMPIRE SHEET METAL, INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. averages 15.4 TCR (468% of the Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. TCR series: 2018=16.5 · 2019=14.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Ducts, sheet metal, manufactur establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 98 Ducts, sheet metal, manufactur employers in California.

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. (57 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc.
Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. (57 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Acosta Sheet Metal Manufacturing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 14.4 8.2 6 1 0
2018 16.5 12.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · CA · San Jose

1,158 Ducts, sheet metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EMPIRE SHEET METAL, INC 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Qualex SOM Biulding at Linkbelt 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elk River CDI Custom Curb Adapters 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pottorff California 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR 118 ABC Supply Co., Inc 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CLARO / PRT - Aguadilla Centro Operaciones / Cuesta Vieja 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Blytheville (Arbly) 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rpb 61 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CCI- Hayesville Plant 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ec Abs San Antonio Central 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE SD,CLEAR LAKE - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nantze, Inc. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.