Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · New York

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130

Rochester, NY · ~117 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 safety composite

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2019→2022

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 injury rate improved

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Rochester, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/14
  • PHOTO ARDx San Diego Amedi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARDx San Diego Ameditech (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 TCR series: 2019=1.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 falls in its industry

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diag establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 14 Blood derivative in-vitro diag employers in New York.

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 (117 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130
Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 (117 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics CNP 130 has fewer employees than the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic sub median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.7 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · NY · Rochester

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARDx San Diego Ameditech 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR QuidelOrtho McKellar 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bio-Rad Laboratories-Plano 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ortho Clinical Diagnostics - Rochester Canal Ponds 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE O&R West Nyack 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gabriel Steel Erectors, Inc 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE D01 NYC Modernization 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wm. J. Keller & sons Construction Corp. 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR BAE Systems Electronic Systems CIA02 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Corporate 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR E3 Entegral Solutions, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1115 - Florence-SC 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE TarfFix Devices, Inc. Fairfield 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acrylic Design Associates 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swanson Manufacturing Services 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #617 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.