Continuing care retirement communities · North Carolina

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates

Columbus, NC · ~233 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates: 4.7 TCR = 124% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates safety composite

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates: 3.6 → 5.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.69× in 2024

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates's TCR rose 2.3 from 3.6 in 2023 to 5.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Columbus, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 124% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #37/105
  • PHOTO Edgewood Wtn Cedar V…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~233 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edgewood Wtn Cedar View (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates averages 4.7 TCR (124% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates TCR series: 2023=3.6 · 2024=5.9 · BLS 3.8

Where ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 105 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Carolina.

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates (233 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates
ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates (233 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.9 3.3 8 1 0
2023 3.6 0.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Columbus

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 17 employers in Columbus, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Wtn Cedar View 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Heritage Towers 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garden Building - ManorView 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covenant Living of Turlock 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Precision Fabrics Group, Inc 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE BRP US Inc. Spruce Pine 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE KSMCastings USA 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kroehler 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Luke's Hospital 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Tryon Estates 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milliken Hatch 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR 00510 - STORE # 510 COLUMBUS 74 FTE
NAT-TCR Bradley Services, Inc 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TXS014 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kayser Automotive Systems 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Villa Park Riverside 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE SCWA - Aviation 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8515, 8568, 8440 KAO Exeter 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utex Industries, Inc. 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alger Correctional Facility 233 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.