Correctional institutions · Michigan

Alger Correctional Facility

Munising, MI · ~233 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alger Correctional Facility runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade F.

Alger Correctional Facility: 11.3 TCR = 353% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alger Correctional Facility safety composite

Alger Correctional Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Alger Correctional Facility: 4.5 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 56.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.45× in 2024

Alger Correctional Facility's TCR rose 0.7 from 4.5 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 56.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Munising, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 353% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #9/31
  • PHOTO COTA
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 101 inj
  • SIZE ~233 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: COTA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Alger Correctional Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alger Correctional Facility averages 11.3 TCR (353% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alger Correctional Facility TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=2 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=49.9 · 2022=56.1 · 2023=6.7 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.2

Where Alger Correctional Facility falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 31 Correctional institutions employers in Michigan.

Alger Correctional Facility (233 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Alger Correctional Facility
Alger Correctional Facility (233 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Alger Correctional Facility has fewer employees than the Correctional institutions median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 5.1 10 0 0
2023 6.7 5.2 8 5 0
2022 56.1 49.4 16 94 0
2021 49.9 45.8 8 103 0
2020 12.1 8.4 18 11 0
2019 7.2 3.2 18 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 7 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 5 0 0
2016 4.5 4.5 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · MI · Munising

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 10 employers in Munising, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR COTA 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michigan Reformatory Correctional Facility 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Federal Correctional Institution Mendota 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisville Jefferson County Metro Govt - Corrections - Hall of Justice 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CertainTeed 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE StageRight Corporation / Rogers Group 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Euclid Manufacturing 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Purem by Eberspaecher North America - Wixom 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR MediLodge of Munising 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Timber Products Company Michigan -Veneer 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Timber Products - Michigan Sawmill 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Timber Products Company Michigan - Veneer 68 FTE
NAT-TCR Setzer Forest Products - Sacramento 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Elbow Lake Store 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Smooth-Bor Plastics 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR J&J Quality Door, Inc 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marriott Shoals Hotel and Spa 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE INEOS Joliet 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sarah A Reed Retirement Center 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE HHSA Admin 233 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.