Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di · Iowa

Administration

Burlington, IA · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Administration runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di workplace, earning a grade C.

Administration: 3.2 TCR = 84% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Administration safety composite

Administration scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2018→2021

Administration injury rate improved

Administration's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Burlington, IA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/30
  • PHOTO Toward Maximum Indep…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Toward Maximum Independence (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Administration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Administration averages 3.2 TCR (84% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Administration TCR series: 2018=4 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Administration falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 30 Activity centers for disabled employers in Iowa.

Administration (26 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Administration
Administration (26 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Administration has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.5 5.5 0 1 0
2018 4.0 4.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · IA · Burlington

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental di employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 68 employers in Burlington, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Toward Maximum Independence 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barber National Institute - Pittsburgh 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PeopleCare of Southern Colorado LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR IGHL 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eastwood Sow Unit 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4806-Urbandale, IA 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE DBQ Downtown Office 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Iowa Electric Cooperative 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shearer's Foods - BUR 727 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shearer's Foods Burlington 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal-Mogul Ignition Company Burlington Iowa Plant 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR CNH_Burlington 576 FTE
NAT-TCR Keeland & Corder Painting, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Simmons Fredericksburg 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Electric Power Board of Chattanooga 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-510-Pottery Barn 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Overhead Door Company of Charlotte 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE VITALIGENT LLC Modesto 357 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 701-D002 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reunion Lake RV Resort 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.