Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · California

Toward Maximum Independence

San Diego, CA · ~344 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Toward Maximum Independence runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Toward Maximum Independence: 3.2 TCR = 84% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Toward Maximum Independence safety composite

Toward Maximum Independence scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Toward Maximum Independence held a steady TCR band

Toward Maximum Independence's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.3 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2018=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · San Diego, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 84% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #73/230
  • PHOTO Administration
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~344 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Administration (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Toward Maximum Independence in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Toward Maximum Independence averages 3.2 TCR (84% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Toward Maximum Independence TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Toward Maximum Independence falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 230 Activity centers for disabled employers in California.

Toward Maximum Independence (344 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Toward Maximum Independence
Toward Maximum Independence (344 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Toward Maximum Independence has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.1 3.1 9 0 0
2017 3.3 1.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · San Diego

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Administration 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barber National Institute - Pittsburgh 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PeopleCare of Southern Colorado LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR IGHL 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Harvesters, Inc 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bernards 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE MONTEBELLO CA PLANT 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE STAAR Surgical Monrovia 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR NA-US-NY-Elmsford-Ridgewood Drive 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Berry Rd 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR KCP&L - Northland Service Center 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Raft River Malta Office 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Splitrock Resort 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norwalk (Ctnlk) 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakewood (Njlak) 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pace industries, Harrison Division 344 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.