Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Tennessee
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga
Chattanooga, TN · ~658 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 3.2
- Avg TCR
- 2.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade C.
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga: 3.2 TCR = 114% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga safety composite
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
34/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 3.2 per 100 workers
Safer than 34% of industry peers
- DART rate
- F 2.8 per 100 workers
Safer than 22% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 52% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga held a steady TCR band
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga's TCR held near 0.2 from 3.9 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=3.9 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=3.7
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 237130 · Chattanooga, TN ABOVE-IND · MID
Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 114% of ind
- DART 2.8 DART
- RANK #13/26
- PHOTO NA-US-NY-Elmsford-Ri…
- BOOK 6y book
- INJ 134 inj
- SIZE ~658 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: NA-US-NY-Elmsford-Ridgewood Drive (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga
3.2 TCR
- NA-US-NY-Elmsf
NA-US-NY-Elmsford-Ridgewood Drive
3.2 TCR
- Directline Com
Directline Communications Inc.
3.2 TCR
- Bristol Tennes
Bristol Tennessee Essential Services
3.2 TCR
- Michels Power
Michels Power Inc-NM-Albuquerque
3.2 TCR
What this shows Electric Power Board of Chattanooga averages 3.2 TCR (114% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=3.7 · BLS 2.8
Where Electric Power Board of Chattanooga falls in its industry
1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishmentsSafer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.
Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 26 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Tennessee.
Electric Power Board of Chattanooga has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 18 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 23 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 26 | 2 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
237130 · TN · Chattanooga
1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | NA-US-NY-Elmsford-Ridgewood Drive | 3.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Directline Communications Inc. | 3.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Bristol Tennessee Essential Services | 3.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Michels Power Inc-NM-Albuquerque | 3.2 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Jostens | 658 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | FedEx 3101 TCHULAHOMA RD | 659 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | 1969-CMC1 | 657 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Sumiriko TN-Tazewell | 656 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | CHATTANOOGA COKE | 8,650 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | CHATTANOOGA FOOD | 8,650 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | USXpress | 7,385 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Cardiology GB | 6,606 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | E&I Engineering USA Corp | 3.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | L. Martone & Sons, Inc. | 3.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Administration | 3.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Keeland & Corder Painting, LLC | 3.2 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Sharp Mesa Vista Hospital | 658 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Attentive Care of Albany, Inc. | 658 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. | 658 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Ponca City Refinery | 658 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.